Secret Service Drives Hard to Protect the President 

Protecting the president of the United States involves far more than being willing to step into the path of gunfire.

As part of their extensive training — ranging from firearms to first aid — all of the several thousand Secret Service agents and officers also have to learn how to drive.

The training, which takes place at a 550-meter (546-yard) track in the state of Maryland, goes way beyond the fundamentals of defensive driving. Among the techniques is the J-turn, in which the driver spins a reversing vehicle 180 degrees and quickly continues, facing forward, with brisk acceleration.

 

WATCH: ‘Beast,’ Bus, Motorcycles — Secret Service Has to Drive it All

​Protective driving

For the Secret Service, this is part of “protective driving,” which has one goal: “Safely get the protectee out of the area — the ‘kill zone’ — and to move them to a safe location as quickly and expeditiously as possible,” according to Thomas Murach, Secret Service assistant to the special agent-in-charge.

Even after the completion of that five-day training, Secret Service personnel are not ready to get behind the wheel of the 9,000-kilogram (9.9-ton) armored presidential stretch limousine known as Cadillac One, or The Beast.

Anyone driving the president or vice president must have passed a separate, advanced five-day training known as the Protective Operations Driving Course, which has about a 60 percent pass rate.

“If an agent doesn’t pass the advanced course, they would continue normal duty and can try again at a later date,” according to Secret Service Public Affairs Specialist Julia McMurray. She added, “It’s not a never-ending cycle of attempts and fails. They can only go a few times.”

​Motorcycles, mountain bikes

Another special course, considered just as challenging as limousine driving, is for the motorcycles, which roll with sidecars in better weather.

“It’s heavy. It’s almost like 900 pounds (400 kilograms),” explained motorcyclist and Secret Service Technical Office Lloyd Llamas about the agency’s big bikes. “And you’re running with two wheels. And they make you do things that you can’t imagine that you could possibly do with that.”

Those are not the Secret Service’s only two-wheelers. Agents and officers must also learn special techniques to ride bicycles.

They also are instructed in special techniques for all-terrain vehicles and even battery-powered golf carts.

Another unique Secret Service vehicle — and the only one the president is likely to ride that is bigger than The Beast — is a bus known as Ground Force One, last seen on the road during Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.

The roomy $1 million black bus, with 47 square meters of interior space, has a twin that was also used by the Secret Service to drive Obama’s unsuccessful general election opponent, Mitt Romney.

Different street types

Driving the president not only means getting behind the wheel in different types of executive transportation, but also different kinds of streets.

For example, different countries have various curb designs. So the Secret Service, at its training facility in Laurel, had part of one street built with two different types of curbs so that drivers of full-sized utility vehicles could learn how to properly run over them.

All of this drilling is meant to prevent a repeat of the Secret Service’s worst moment on Nov. 22, 1963, when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas by a sniper’s bullet as he sat in the back seat of a Lincoln Continental open convertible.

That compelled a hardening of titanium plating, as well as a permanent bullet-proof roof for the car, which was used by Kennedy’s successor, Lyndon Johnson, until 1967.

​Evolving training

Formal training for Secret Service drivers didn’t begin until 1970.

The training techniques have changed as the vehicles have evolved — going all the way back to the 1939 Lincoln K-Series car, which was President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s favorite ride.

Roosevelt’s 12-cylinder-engine vehicle had a retractable roof, allowing the polio-stricken president to appear before crowds without leaving the car. It also was the first to be significantly modified for the protection of a president, equipped with armor-plated doors, bulletproof tires, thick windows and storage compartments for weapons for the agents who rode along standing on extra-wide running boards and gripping exterior handles.

“In the past, we taught what’s called threshold-breaking. Or if your car didn’t have anti-lock brakes, you would bring the wheels to the point they’re almost locked up but not quite,” Murach said.

Some elements dealing with stability control were removed from the training, as modern vehicles are more stable. And tire technology has evolved with the rubber gripping much better nowadays on slick surfaces.

The Secret Service, which is under the Department of Homeland Security, protects not only the president and vice president, their immediate family members, and former presidents and first ladies, but also visiting foreign leaders and major candidates in U.S. presidential campaigns.

Successful candidates who end up getting a ride to the White House driveway quickly find out they can get anything they want as president — except the keys to the car.

your ad here

Secret Service Drives Hard to Protect the President 

Protecting the president of the United States involves far more than being willing to step into the path of gunfire.

As part of their extensive training — ranging from firearms to first aid — all of the several thousand Secret Service agents and officers also have to learn how to drive.

The training, which takes place at a 550-meter (546-yard) track in the state of Maryland, goes way beyond the fundamentals of defensive driving. Among the techniques is the J-turn, in which the driver spins a reversing vehicle 180 degrees and quickly continues, facing forward, with brisk acceleration.

 

WATCH: ‘Beast,’ Bus, Motorcycles — Secret Service Has to Drive it All

​Protective driving

For the Secret Service, this is part of “protective driving,” which has one goal: “Safely get the protectee out of the area — the ‘kill zone’ — and to move them to a safe location as quickly and expeditiously as possible,” according to Thomas Murach, Secret Service assistant to the special agent-in-charge.

Even after the completion of that five-day training, Secret Service personnel are not ready to get behind the wheel of the 9,000-kilogram (9.9-ton) armored presidential stretch limousine known as Cadillac One, or The Beast.

Anyone driving the president or vice president must have passed a separate, advanced five-day training known as the Protective Operations Driving Course, which has about a 60 percent pass rate.

“If an agent doesn’t pass the advanced course, they would continue normal duty and can try again at a later date,” according to Secret Service Public Affairs Specialist Julia McMurray. She added, “It’s not a never-ending cycle of attempts and fails. They can only go a few times.”

​Motorcycles, mountain bikes

Another special course, considered just as challenging as limousine driving, is for the motorcycles, which roll with sidecars in better weather.

“It’s heavy. It’s almost like 900 pounds (400 kilograms),” explained motorcyclist and Secret Service Technical Office Lloyd Llamas about the agency’s big bikes. “And you’re running with two wheels. And they make you do things that you can’t imagine that you could possibly do with that.”

Those are not the Secret Service’s only two-wheelers. Agents and officers must also learn special techniques to ride bicycles.

They also are instructed in special techniques for all-terrain vehicles and even battery-powered golf carts.

Another unique Secret Service vehicle — and the only one the president is likely to ride that is bigger than The Beast — is a bus known as Ground Force One, last seen on the road during Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.

The roomy $1 million black bus, with 47 square meters of interior space, has a twin that was also used by the Secret Service to drive Obama’s unsuccessful general election opponent, Mitt Romney.

Different street types

Driving the president not only means getting behind the wheel in different types of executive transportation, but also different kinds of streets.

For example, different countries have various curb designs. So the Secret Service, at its training facility in Laurel, had part of one street built with two different types of curbs so that drivers of full-sized utility vehicles could learn how to properly run over them.

All of this drilling is meant to prevent a repeat of the Secret Service’s worst moment on Nov. 22, 1963, when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas by a sniper’s bullet as he sat in the back seat of a Lincoln Continental open convertible.

That compelled a hardening of titanium plating, as well as a permanent bullet-proof roof for the car, which was used by Kennedy’s successor, Lyndon Johnson, until 1967.

​Evolving training

Formal training for Secret Service drivers didn’t begin until 1970.

The training techniques have changed as the vehicles have evolved — going all the way back to the 1939 Lincoln K-Series car, which was President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s favorite ride.

Roosevelt’s 12-cylinder-engine vehicle had a retractable roof, allowing the polio-stricken president to appear before crowds without leaving the car. It also was the first to be significantly modified for the protection of a president, equipped with armor-plated doors, bulletproof tires, thick windows and storage compartments for weapons for the agents who rode along standing on extra-wide running boards and gripping exterior handles.

“In the past, we taught what’s called threshold-breaking. Or if your car didn’t have anti-lock brakes, you would bring the wheels to the point they’re almost locked up but not quite,” Murach said.

Some elements dealing with stability control were removed from the training, as modern vehicles are more stable. And tire technology has evolved with the rubber gripping much better nowadays on slick surfaces.

The Secret Service, which is under the Department of Homeland Security, protects not only the president and vice president, their immediate family members, and former presidents and first ladies, but also visiting foreign leaders and major candidates in U.S. presidential campaigns.

Successful candidates who end up getting a ride to the White House driveway quickly find out they can get anything they want as president — except the keys to the car.

your ad here

Secret Service Drives Hard to Protect the President

Protecting the president of the United States involves far more than being willing to step into the path of gunfire. As VOA’s White House bureau chief Steve Herman reports from the Secret Service’s training center in Laurel, Maryland, every one of its agents and officers also has to learn how to drive.

your ad here

Secret Service Drives Hard to Protect the President

Protecting the president of the United States involves far more than being willing to step into the path of gunfire. As VOA’s White House bureau chief Steve Herman reports from the Secret Service’s training center in Laurel, Maryland, every one of its agents and officers also has to learn how to drive.

your ad here

US Military Creates 3D-Printed Bridges

3D printers have been used to create incredible things, from robots to prosthetic arms. Now the U.S. Marines have used the technology to make a 3D-printed concrete footbridge. Khrystyna Shevchenko traveled to Camp Pendleton in California to take a look. Anna Rice narrates her story.

your ad here

US Military Creates 3D-Printed Bridges

3D printers have been used to create incredible things, from robots to prosthetic arms. Now the U.S. Marines have used the technology to make a 3D-printed concrete footbridge. Khrystyna Shevchenko traveled to Camp Pendleton in California to take a look. Anna Rice narrates her story.

your ad here

UK’s May: Long Search for Compromise Puts Brexit at Risk

British Prime Minister Theresa May said Saturday that the longer it takes to find a compromise with the opposition Labour Party to secure a parliamentary majority for a Brexit deal, the less likely it is that Britain will leave the European Union. 

May has so far failed to secure backing for her negotiated agreement with Brussels, as some Conservative lawmakers and Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party, which props up her minority government, have voted it down. 

She has since turned to the opposition Labour Party in a bid to secure a majority for an orderly Brexit, although its leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said Saturday that he was waiting for May to move her Brexit red lines. 

“The fact is that on Brexit there are areas where the two main parties agree: We both want to end free movement, we both want to leave with a good deal, and we both want to protect jobs,” May said in comments released by her Downing Street office. 

‘The only way’

“That is the basis for a compromise that can win a majority in Parliament, and winning that majority is the only way to deliver Brexit.” 

She added, “The longer this takes, the greater the risk of the UK never leaving at all.” 

May has a plan to enshrine in law a customs arrangement with the EU to win over the Labour Party, and her aides have discussed offering the opposition a place in the British delegation to Wednesday’s EU summit, The Sunday Times reported. 

The prime minister has asked EU leaders to postpone Britain’s exit from the bloc until June 30. The EU, which gave her a two-week extension the last time she asked, insists she must first show a viable plan to secure agreement on her thrice-rejected divorce deal in the British Parliament. 

It is the latest twist in a saga that leaves Britain, the world’s fifth-biggest economy, struggling to find a way to honor a 2016 referendum result to take the country out of the globe’s largest trading bloc.  

Pressure on both parties

May reiterated Saturday her hope that lawmakers would approve a deal to allow Britain to leave the bloc as quickly as possible. 

“My intention is to reach an agreement with my fellow EU leaders that will mean if we can agree a deal here at home, we can leave the EU in just six weeks,” she said. 

One of the most senior Brexiters in her government, the leader of the lower house of Parliament, Andrea Leadsom, also said there was a risk of Brexit slipping further from lawmakers’ grasp. 

“The vision we had of Brexit is fading away — and we are running out of time to save it,” she wrote in The Sunday Telegraph newspaper. 

Some of May’s lawmakers are warning they will try to oust her if Britain participates in EU parliamentary elections next month and is forced to extend membership of the bloc beyond June, The Observer newspaper reported. 

The Sunday Telegraph said ministers are discussing whether to resign if a Brexit delay means Britain must field candidates. 

​Local candidates’ anger

In a further sign of the ever heavier strains on the Conservatives, more than 100 candidates for upcoming local elections wrote to May warning of the growing anger at the grass-roots level and among the public. 

“Our party and our government have completely lost touch with voters,” the candidates said, according to The Sunday Telegraph. “Let’s be clear: More fudge and a further dilution of Brexit is not the answer.” 

Opposition leader Corbyn also faces pressure as more than 80 of his lawmakers warned that another vote on Brexit must be a red line in Labour’s talks with the government, The Independent newspaper said.

your ad here

UK’s May: Long Search for Compromise Puts Brexit at Risk

British Prime Minister Theresa May said Saturday that the longer it takes to find a compromise with the opposition Labour Party to secure a parliamentary majority for a Brexit deal, the less likely it is that Britain will leave the European Union. 

May has so far failed to secure backing for her negotiated agreement with Brussels, as some Conservative lawmakers and Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party, which props up her minority government, have voted it down. 

She has since turned to the opposition Labour Party in a bid to secure a majority for an orderly Brexit, although its leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said Saturday that he was waiting for May to move her Brexit red lines. 

“The fact is that on Brexit there are areas where the two main parties agree: We both want to end free movement, we both want to leave with a good deal, and we both want to protect jobs,” May said in comments released by her Downing Street office. 

‘The only way’

“That is the basis for a compromise that can win a majority in Parliament, and winning that majority is the only way to deliver Brexit.” 

She added, “The longer this takes, the greater the risk of the UK never leaving at all.” 

May has a plan to enshrine in law a customs arrangement with the EU to win over the Labour Party, and her aides have discussed offering the opposition a place in the British delegation to Wednesday’s EU summit, The Sunday Times reported. 

The prime minister has asked EU leaders to postpone Britain’s exit from the bloc until June 30. The EU, which gave her a two-week extension the last time she asked, insists she must first show a viable plan to secure agreement on her thrice-rejected divorce deal in the British Parliament. 

It is the latest twist in a saga that leaves Britain, the world’s fifth-biggest economy, struggling to find a way to honor a 2016 referendum result to take the country out of the globe’s largest trading bloc.  

Pressure on both parties

May reiterated Saturday her hope that lawmakers would approve a deal to allow Britain to leave the bloc as quickly as possible. 

“My intention is to reach an agreement with my fellow EU leaders that will mean if we can agree a deal here at home, we can leave the EU in just six weeks,” she said. 

One of the most senior Brexiters in her government, the leader of the lower house of Parliament, Andrea Leadsom, also said there was a risk of Brexit slipping further from lawmakers’ grasp. 

“The vision we had of Brexit is fading away — and we are running out of time to save it,” she wrote in The Sunday Telegraph newspaper. 

Some of May’s lawmakers are warning they will try to oust her if Britain participates in EU parliamentary elections next month and is forced to extend membership of the bloc beyond June, The Observer newspaper reported. 

The Sunday Telegraph said ministers are discussing whether to resign if a Brexit delay means Britain must field candidates. 

​Local candidates’ anger

In a further sign of the ever heavier strains on the Conservatives, more than 100 candidates for upcoming local elections wrote to May warning of the growing anger at the grass-roots level and among the public. 

“Our party and our government have completely lost touch with voters,” the candidates said, according to The Sunday Telegraph. “Let’s be clear: More fudge and a further dilution of Brexit is not the answer.” 

Opposition leader Corbyn also faces pressure as more than 80 of his lawmakers warned that another vote on Brexit must be a red line in Labour’s talks with the government, The Independent newspaper said.

your ad here

Trump: History Lesson Led to Golan Heights Decision

U.S. President Donald Trump said Saturday that he made the controversial decision to recognize Israel’s 1981 annexation of the Golan Heights after getting a quick history lesson during a conversation on a different 

subject. 

Speaking at a Republican Jewish Coalition gathering in Las Vegas, Trump said he made the decision during a discussion with his top Middle East peace advisers, including the U.S. ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, and son-in-law Jared Kushner. 

“I said, ‘Fellows, do me a favor. Give me a little history, quick. Want to go fast. I got a lot of things I’m working on: China, North Korea. Give me a quickie,” Trump said to laughter from the Las Vegas crowd.

“‘How do you like the idea of me recognizing exactly what we’re discussing?'” said Trump, recounting the conversation. 

Trump, who typically demands short, sharp briefings and is known for his colorful retelling of stories, said Friedman was shocked, “like a wonderful, beautiful baby,” and asked the president if he would actually do it. 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Trump last month. At their March 25 meeting, Trump signed a proclamation officially granting U.S. recognition of the Golan as Israeli territory, a dramatic departure from decades of U.S. policy. The move, which Trump announced in a tweet days prior, was widely seen as an attempt to boost Netanyahu, who is up for re-election on April 9.

‘Bing!’

Israel captured the Golan in the 1967 Middle East war and annexed it in 1981 in a move not recognized internationally.

“I went, ‘Bing!’ It was done,” Trump said Saturday, describing the swiftness of his decision. “We make fast decisions. And we make good decisions.”

When Trump asked the crowd who would win Israel’s election — there were shouts of “Bibi!” — Trump responded, “I think it’s going to be close. Two good people.”

Netanyahu is fighting for his political survival against former top general Benny Gantz, a political novice.

Republican megadonor Sheldon Adelson, who is reportedly gravely ill, watched the speech in person.

Earlier, three protesters stood on their chairs as Trump began to speak, shouting, “Jews are here to say: Occupation is a plague.” The rest of the crowd quickly drowned them out with chants of “USA! USA!” Security guards removed the protesters.

“He is going back to Mommy and he will be reprimanded,” Trump said of the protesters. “She gets it.” 

your ad here

Israel’s Netanyahu Plans to Annex Settlements in West Bank

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Saturday that he would annex Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank if he wins another term in office, a last-minute pre-election promise likely to enrage Palestinians and the Arab world. 

In an interview with Israeli Channel 12 News three days ahead of the April 9 poll, Netanyahu was asked why he had not extended sovereignty to large West Bank settlements, as Israel did without international recognition in East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, both captured in the 1967 Middle East war. 

“Who says that we won’t do it? We are on the way and we are discussing it,” Netanyahu said. 

“You are asking whether we are moving on to the next stage. The answer is yes, we will move to the next stage,” he said. “I am going to extend [Israeli] sovereignty and I don’t distinguish between settlement blocs and the isolated settlements.” 

Netanyahu is competing for votes with small far-right parties who advocate annexation. His comments are likely to appeal to hard-line voters, who object to ceding lands to the Palestinians. 

‘Settlements are illegal’

A spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Nabil Abu Rdainah, told Reuters: “Any measures and any announcements will not change the facts. Settlements are illegal and they will be removed.” 

The Palestinians want to establish a state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, all territory Israel captured in 1967. Israel has annexed East Jerusalem and withdrawn from Gaza. The West Bank remains under Israeli military occupation with limited Palestinian self-rule. 

Settlements are one of the most heated issues in efforts to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, frozen since 2014. 

After decades of settlement building, more than 400,000 Israelis now live in the West Bank, protected by an Israeli military presence that divides some Palestinian communities and cuts off towns and villages with checkpoints. 

The Palestinians and many countries consider this to be illegal under the Geneva Conventions that bar settling on land captured in war. Israel disputes this, citing security needs and biblical, historical and political connections to the land. 

While vowing that he would not evacuate settlers from their homes, Netanyahu has also said in the past that the future of the settlements should be determined in peace talks with the Palestinians. 

Eye on election

His remarks on Saturday were viewed in Israeli media as an attempt to draw right-wing votes rather than an immediate change of policy. 

There was no immediate comment from the U.S. Embassy about Netanyahu’s remarks, which followed a series of announcements and policy changes by U.S. President Donald Trump that were seen to favor Israel. 

In March, Trump broke with decades of international consensus by recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, territory Israel captured from Syria. 

That followed his December 2017 decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and to move the U.S. Embassy there. Both moves delighted Israel, infuriated Palestinian and Arab leaders, and were opposed by most U.S. allies. 

U.S. officials have said they will unveil a long-awaited Trump administration Middle East peace plan after the Israeli election, but prospects to restart negotiations appear dim. 

The Palestinians have been boycotting the Trump administration over its Jerusalem moves and other recent decisions they view as biased in Israel’s favor.

your ad here

Tunisian President, 92, Says He Plans No Re-election Bid

Tunisia’s 92-year-old president said Saturday that he did not plan to stand for re-election in the November polls, in order to make way for someone younger. 

 

“In all honesty, I don’t think I will put myself forward,” President Beji Caid Essebsi told the Nidaa Tounes party, which he founded in 2012, adding it was time “to open the door to the youth.” 

 

His speech before thousands of members at the party’s congress came several days after Abdelaziz Bouteflika, the 82-year-old ailing leader of neighboring Algeria, resigned in the face of huge protests ending two decades in power.  

 

Essebsi, Tunisia’s first democratically elected president, urged his party however, to overcome bitter internal divisions and to bring Prime Minister Youssef Chahed back into the fold. 

 

Tensions have flared between Chahed and Essebsi’s son, Hafedh Caid Essebsi, leading to the premier’s being sidelined from Nidaa Tounes and forming his own rival party, Tahia Tounes. 

 

Essebsi’s secularist Nidaa Tounes won the 2014 elections and formed a coalition with the Islamist-inspired Ennahdha that lasted four years before the two parties split. 

 

Presidential elections are due on Nov. 17; parliamentary elections are set for Oct. 6. 

 

Tunisia, whose 2011 revolt toppled longtime dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and sparked the Arab Spring uprisings, has been hailed as a model of democratization in the Arab world, but has faced economic woes and jihadist attacks. 

 

None of the North African country’s main political parties has yet announced a candidate for the presidential polls.

your ad here

Forces Loyal to Haftar Advance on Parts of Tripoli

Forces loyal to eastern Libyan military commander Gen. Khalifa Haftar appear to have gained ground along the outskirts of the Libyan capital, Tripoli.

 

Arab media broadcast video of Haftar’s forces entering the gates of Tripoli’s now-closed international airport, before taking positions outside terminal buildings and along the now-unused runways. There did not appear to be any resistance to the takeover. 

Arab media also showed residents of neighborhoods near the capital cheering as Haftar’s forces entered. Saudi-owned al-Arabiya TV said Haftar’s forces had entered the Khalat al-Fargan district of the capital. VOA could not independently confirm the claim. 

Four towns controlled

 

Haftar’s military spokesman, Col. Ahmad Almismari, told a press conference Saturday afternoon that forces under Haftar’s command were gaining ground. 

 

He said Haftar’s forces were in control of the towns of Gharyan, Jendouba, Qasr al-Beshir and Suwani. He said 14 soldiers fighting with the Libyan army had been killed in fighting. 

 

The spokesman said air force planes loyal to Haftar had launched at least four raids near the Bab al-Aziziya military compound south of the capital, but that there were no casualties. He said, however, that planes from the nearby town of Misrata, which opposes Haftar, had killed a number of civilians in a raid over the town of Ghariyan, which Haftar now controls. 

 

As the fighting appeared to spread, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres insisted, during a visit to Jordan, that the U.N. “would never give up its support [for] the Libyan people.” 

 

U.N. special envoy Ghassan Salame, who is in Libya, said he was monitoring the situation closely.

 

He said tensions were increasing in a number of places in and around Tripoli and that he was keeping tabs on the situation. He said it was urgent that tension in those areas be ended and that civilians’ safety be ensured.

In Cairo, Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi called on the international community to take action to restore stability to the Libyan capital. Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukri told visiting Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov that Libya has been out of control since the revolution that overthrew Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. 

Shoukri said the situation in Libya has been worrisome over the past few years with respect to the lack of stability and spread of terrorism, increasing the danger to the Libyan people. 

Lavrov: Commence talks

 

Lavrov urged all parties to stop fighting and start negotiating and said the international community must prevent the situation from escalating. He urged Libya’s warring parties to cease military operations and sit down at the negotiating table. 

 

U.N. envoy Salame, for his part, insisted that “every effort would be made to hold the upcoming national dialogue conference” in the southern town of Ghadames, “unless the situation on the ground made it impossible to do so.”

your ad here

Forces Loyal to Haftar Advance on Parts of Tripoli

Forces loyal to eastern Libyan military commander Gen. Khalifa Haftar appear to have gained ground along the outskirts of the Libyan capital, Tripoli.

 

Arab media broadcast video of Haftar’s forces entering the gates of Tripoli’s now-closed international airport, before taking positions outside terminal buildings and along the now-unused runways. There did not appear to be any resistance to the takeover. 

Arab media also showed residents of neighborhoods near the capital cheering as Haftar’s forces entered. Saudi-owned al-Arabiya TV said Haftar’s forces had entered the Khalat al-Fargan district of the capital. VOA could not independently confirm the claim. 

Four towns controlled

 

Haftar’s military spokesman, Col. Ahmad Almismari, told a press conference Saturday afternoon that forces under Haftar’s command were gaining ground. 

 

He said Haftar’s forces were in control of the towns of Gharyan, Jendouba, Qasr al-Beshir and Suwani. He said 14 soldiers fighting with the Libyan army had been killed in fighting. 

 

The spokesman said air force planes loyal to Haftar had launched at least four raids near the Bab al-Aziziya military compound south of the capital, but that there were no casualties. He said, however, that planes from the nearby town of Misrata, which opposes Haftar, had killed a number of civilians in a raid over the town of Ghariyan, which Haftar now controls. 

 

As the fighting appeared to spread, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres insisted, during a visit to Jordan, that the U.N. “would never give up its support [for] the Libyan people.” 

 

U.N. special envoy Ghassan Salame, who is in Libya, said he was monitoring the situation closely.

 

He said tensions were increasing in a number of places in and around Tripoli and that he was keeping tabs on the situation. He said it was urgent that tension in those areas be ended and that civilians’ safety be ensured.

In Cairo, Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi called on the international community to take action to restore stability to the Libyan capital. Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukri told visiting Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov that Libya has been out of control since the revolution that overthrew Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. 

Shoukri said the situation in Libya has been worrisome over the past few years with respect to the lack of stability and spread of terrorism, increasing the danger to the Libyan people. 

Lavrov: Commence talks

 

Lavrov urged all parties to stop fighting and start negotiating and said the international community must prevent the situation from escalating. He urged Libya’s warring parties to cease military operations and sit down at the negotiating table. 

 

U.N. envoy Salame, for his part, insisted that “every effort would be made to hold the upcoming national dialogue conference” in the southern town of Ghadames, “unless the situation on the ground made it impossible to do so.”

your ad here

Sudan Protesters Reach Military Headquarters for First Time

Many of the thousands of Sudanese demonstrators marching in Khartoum Saturday reached the country’s military’s headquarters for the first time since deadly anti-government protests erupted nearly four months ago.

After protesters began rallying on the streets of the capital city Khartoum, many heeded a call by organizers to converge on the military’s headquarters, located near the residence of President Omar al-Bashir.

Protesters also reached the army’s building in the east central Sudanese city of Madani, witnesses told AFP.

The protests began on December 19, with demonstrators accusing Bashir’s government of economic mismanagement that has sparked skyrocketing food prices, and fuel and foreign currency shortages.

Bashir imposed a nationwide state of emergency on February 22 in an attempt to suppress the protests after an initial crackdown failed. The government said weeks ago that 31 people had been killed, but the group Physicians for Human Rights estimates the death toll is at least 60.

The government continues to enforce tough measures that have resulted in the arrests of protesters, opposition leaders and journalists.

Since the state of emergency took effect, protests have largely been confined to Khartoum and its twin city of Omdurman. But on Saturday organizers called for more rallies and a march on the military’s headquarters.

The protest movement was first spearheaded by the Sudanese Professionals Association but later won the support of several political parties, including the main opposition party, the National Umma Party.

Protest organizers chose April 6 for nationwide rallies because it was on that date in 1985 when a military uprising led to the overthrow of the government of President Jaafar Nimeiri in a bloodless coup.

After an elected government was in place for a few years, Bashir, a career army officer, toppled the leadership in a 1989 coup with the support of Islamist hardliners.

 

your ad here

Sudan Protesters Reach Military Headquarters for First Time

Many of the thousands of Sudanese demonstrators marching in Khartoum Saturday reached the country’s military’s headquarters for the first time since deadly anti-government protests erupted nearly four months ago.

After protesters began rallying on the streets of the capital city Khartoum, many heeded a call by organizers to converge on the military’s headquarters, located near the residence of President Omar al-Bashir.

Protesters also reached the army’s building in the east central Sudanese city of Madani, witnesses told AFP.

The protests began on December 19, with demonstrators accusing Bashir’s government of economic mismanagement that has sparked skyrocketing food prices, and fuel and foreign currency shortages.

Bashir imposed a nationwide state of emergency on February 22 in an attempt to suppress the protests after an initial crackdown failed. The government said weeks ago that 31 people had been killed, but the group Physicians for Human Rights estimates the death toll is at least 60.

The government continues to enforce tough measures that have resulted in the arrests of protesters, opposition leaders and journalists.

Since the state of emergency took effect, protests have largely been confined to Khartoum and its twin city of Omdurman. But on Saturday organizers called for more rallies and a march on the military’s headquarters.

The protest movement was first spearheaded by the Sudanese Professionals Association but later won the support of several political parties, including the main opposition party, the National Umma Party.

Protest organizers chose April 6 for nationwide rallies because it was on that date in 1985 when a military uprising led to the overthrow of the government of President Jaafar Nimeiri in a bloodless coup.

After an elected government was in place for a few years, Bashir, a career army officer, toppled the leadership in a 1989 coup with the support of Islamist hardliners.

 

your ad here

NATO Chief Rejects ‘Spheres of Influence’

At the final press conference marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a question was raised as to whether NATO was partly responsible for current tensions with Moscow, “because it has expanded right up to the borders of Russia” and whether it was a good idea to “publicly advertise open invitations to Georgia and Ukraine” to join the alliance.

Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General since October 2014, responded by saying: “Just the idea that it is a provocation against Russia that Georgia aspires for membership, or that Ukraine does the same, is really, really dangerous.”

“As soon as you accept that that’s a provocation against Russia, you accept that Russia has the right to decide what neighbors can do,” he said, adding that doing so equates accepting “a world order where big powers can decide what neighbors can or cannot do,” which will then lead to re-establishing “the whole idea of spheres of influence.”

The Cold War-era Warsaw Pact, where Central and Eastern European nations were subjected to Soviet Union’s guidelines and dictates, is widely seen as an example and demonstration of “spheres of influence” at work.

Stoltenberg, who twice had served as Norwegian prime minister before assuming the leadership role at NATO, spoke of his and his country’s experience.  Describing his native land as another “small country bordering Russia,” Stoltenberg said: “I’m very glad that back in 1949 when we joined NATO, the United States and the United Kingdom and the other founding members of NATO never accepted (the notion) that the Soviet Union could decide what Norway could (or could not) do.”

Earlier in the week, in a speech delivered at the North Atlantic Council, the principal political decision-making body within NATO, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo marked the 70th anniversary of NATO by recalling his own personal experience.

“As a young armor officer a couple decades back, I patrolled the border between then-East Germany and West Germany. I know the nature of the regimes that want to undermine what it is we’re here to talk about today.

 

Pompeo reiterated in his speech that NATO’s success lies in deterrence, democratic underpinnings and collective defense commitment.

Two years ago, the United States Senate voted overwhelmingly in support of Montenegro’s membership in NATO; it is now reviewing North Macedonia’s bid.

Speaking on the growing size of NATO, Stoltenberg noted that “the enlargement is not NATO moving east,” instead, he pointed out, it is due to Central and Eastern European nations’ wish – often determination – to seek membership in the alliance.

Daniel S. Hamilton, a transatlantic relations expert at Johns Hopkins University, told VOA that over the years – indeed the last seven decades – NATO has demonstrated a “sort of a magnetic quality.”

In February of this year, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko described pursuing membership in NATO and the European Union as a “strategic mission” and amended his country’s constitution to the effect that Ukraine may one day become a members of these organizations.

Meanwhile, Georgia, another country often described as situated on Russia’s doorstep, is acknowledged as “one of the alliance’s closest partners.” Observers have noted Georgia’s significant contribution in support of NATO’s war effort in Afghanistan as an unambiguous sign of its commitment to the organization and existing member states.

Ultimately, “Georgia and Ukraine are independent sovereign nations which have the sovereign right to choose their own paths,” said NATO’s secretary general.

 

your ad here

NATO Chief Rejects ‘Spheres of Influence’

At the final press conference marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a question was raised as to whether NATO was partly responsible for current tensions with Moscow, “because it has expanded right up to the borders of Russia” and whether it was a good idea to “publicly advertise open invitations to Georgia and Ukraine” to join the alliance.

Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General since October 2014, responded by saying: “Just the idea that it is a provocation against Russia that Georgia aspires for membership, or that Ukraine does the same, is really, really dangerous.”

“As soon as you accept that that’s a provocation against Russia, you accept that Russia has the right to decide what neighbors can do,” he said, adding that doing so equates accepting “a world order where big powers can decide what neighbors can or cannot do,” which will then lead to re-establishing “the whole idea of spheres of influence.”

The Cold War-era Warsaw Pact, where Central and Eastern European nations were subjected to Soviet Union’s guidelines and dictates, is widely seen as an example and demonstration of “spheres of influence” at work.

Stoltenberg, who twice had served as Norwegian prime minister before assuming the leadership role at NATO, spoke of his and his country’s experience.  Describing his native land as another “small country bordering Russia,” Stoltenberg said: “I’m very glad that back in 1949 when we joined NATO, the United States and the United Kingdom and the other founding members of NATO never accepted (the notion) that the Soviet Union could decide what Norway could (or could not) do.”

Earlier in the week, in a speech delivered at the North Atlantic Council, the principal political decision-making body within NATO, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo marked the 70th anniversary of NATO by recalling his own personal experience.

“As a young armor officer a couple decades back, I patrolled the border between then-East Germany and West Germany. I know the nature of the regimes that want to undermine what it is we’re here to talk about today.

 

Pompeo reiterated in his speech that NATO’s success lies in deterrence, democratic underpinnings and collective defense commitment.

Two years ago, the United States Senate voted overwhelmingly in support of Montenegro’s membership in NATO; it is now reviewing North Macedonia’s bid.

Speaking on the growing size of NATO, Stoltenberg noted that “the enlargement is not NATO moving east,” instead, he pointed out, it is due to Central and Eastern European nations’ wish – often determination – to seek membership in the alliance.

Daniel S. Hamilton, a transatlantic relations expert at Johns Hopkins University, told VOA that over the years – indeed the last seven decades – NATO has demonstrated a “sort of a magnetic quality.”

In February of this year, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko described pursuing membership in NATO and the European Union as a “strategic mission” and amended his country’s constitution to the effect that Ukraine may one day become a members of these organizations.

Meanwhile, Georgia, another country often described as situated on Russia’s doorstep, is acknowledged as “one of the alliance’s closest partners.” Observers have noted Georgia’s significant contribution in support of NATO’s war effort in Afghanistan as an unambiguous sign of its commitment to the organization and existing member states.

Ultimately, “Georgia and Ukraine are independent sovereign nations which have the sovereign right to choose their own paths,” said NATO’s secretary general.

 

your ad here

Cameroon Deploys Troops Bracing for Anti-Biya Protests

Cameroon has deployed troops to crack down on protesters calling for the release from jail of 150 opposition party members, including their leader Maurice Kamto, who says he won the October presidential election, not long-serving President Paul Biya. Kamto has been in jail for more than two months and his supporters say he should be unconditionally released.

It was a quiet but tense Saturday morning in some neighborhoods of Cameroon’s capital, Yaounde, as residents went about their daily activities, watched by combat-ready police. Half a dozen officers have been deployed around the headquarters of the Cameroon Renaissance Movement party of Kamto, who remains in jail and insists he won the presidential election on Oct. 7, even though official results give a decisive victory to incumbent Biya.

Territorial Administration Minister Paul Atanga Nji said security forces are there to protect the population from the opposition political party that he said wants to see the country in chaos.

He said even though President Biya has kept Cameroon democratic and peaceful, with freedoms and liberties, authorities will not accept protests carried out in disrespect of the law and they will not tolerate those who want to use violence to make their voices heard. He said Cameroonians are peace-loving people who reject the violence some opposition parties want to bring.

Nji said Saturday the government banned protests organized by the opposition MRC party until April 13 because the action is provocative and intended to create an uprising in a country that already has Boko Haram terrorism to contend with on its northern border with Nigeria. He pointed out that Cameroon also has suffered from carnage that has spilled over from the neighboring Central African Republic on its eastern border and has had to deal with the separatist crisis that killed at least 1,000 people in the English-speaking regions of the bilingual country that also has French as its official language.

Nji said April 6, which the MRC chose for its protests, remains a painful day for Cameroonians because it is the anniversary of a 1984 coup attempt to oust Biya from power. He said he has instructed all 10 regional governors to arrest anyone who protests.

MRC Party Secretary General Christopher Ndong says members are mobilized and ready to demonstrate their support for jailed members of their party and Kamto, who claims his victory was stolen by Biya.

“Do you expect us to fold our hands and stand. Professor Maurice Kamto won the 2018 presidential election and the president that was supposed to be [in power] was the one caught and locked up. The government does not want him to take over power. Our liberties are infringed, our right to freedom of speech infringed. It is not because the government is clamping down on us that will make the population fear,” Ndong said.

The protesters had asked for authorization to march and asked the government to solve the crisis in the English-speaking regions that has gone on for three years.

Pierre Hubert Mbida of the Cameroon Citizenship Movement said by refusing to authorize the protest and deploying security forces to clamp down on protesters, Cameroon is simply confirming that it disrespects people’s rights and freedoms.

He said the Cameroon government is abusing public liberties and people’s freedoms and expresses joy only when its supporters sing praises about its management of public affairs, governance and its long serving leader Biya. He said it is funny that when people go to the streets to complain that they lack water to drink, they are described as unpatriotic citizens who are a menace to public order. He said it is intolerable that for quite some time now, Cameroon has continued to recruit soldiers to protect its leaders.

Biya, who has led Cameroon for 36 years, won 71.3 percent of the vote, far ahead of Kamto’s 14.2 percent, according to official results of the Oct. 7 poll.

Police arrested Kamto and his supporters more than two months ago after days of peaceful protests turned violent in Yaounde and three other cities.

Kamto is charged with sedition, insurrection and inciting violence in Cameroon and its embassies, including in Paris and Berlin.

 

 

your ad here

Judge Again Halts High-Capacity Magazine Sales in California

A federal judge on Friday halted sales of high-capacity ammunition magazines in California, giving state officials a chance to appeal his order last week that allowed their sale for the first time in nearly 20 years.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez barred further sales until the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considers whether to reinstate the state’s ban on magazines holding more than 10 bullets.

But the judge said those who bought the extended magazines since his initial order a week ago may keep them without fear of being prosecuted while the appeal proceeds.

A week of sales

Hundreds of thousands of gun owners may have bought the magazines since Benitez threw out the state’s ban last week as infringing on their Second Amendment right to bear arms, said Chuck Michel, an attorney for the National Rifle Association and the California Rifle & Pistol Association who filed the lawsuit that led to the ruling.

Under Benitez’s order, no one in California is permitted to manufacture, import, buy or sell large-capacity magazines as of 5 p.m. Friday.

California has prohibited such magazines since 2000, though people who had the magazines before then were allowed to keep them. Benitez last week threw out both the 2000 law and a 2016 law and ballot measure banning possession even by those who had owned them legally.

“All the people who bought the magazines in the last week are protected from prosecution, but any further purchase of these magazines is illegal for the moment,” Michel said. “There was 20 years of pent up demand for these self-defense tools, and several hundred thousand people bought them in the last week, maybe more than several hundred thousand.”

Difficult to take back

Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who sought the stay, warned in a court filing that it would be difficult for the state to remove the newly purchased magazines, even if the ban is reinstated.

Becerra cited a half-dozen mass shootings nationwide since 2011 where the killers used large-capacity magazines.

“California leads the nation when it comes to common-sense gun laws. We should all be ensuring the safety of our communities, not fighting against long-standing laws that improve public safety,” Becerra said in a statement. He added that he’s confident the ban is constitutional.

Benitez acknowledged in his six-page stay order that other judges, in California and elsewhere, have upheld bans on high-capacity magazines.

“The Court understands that strong emotions are felt by people of good will on both sides of the Constitutional and social policy questions. The Court understands that thoughtful and law-abiding citizens can and do firmly hold competing opinions on firearm magazine restrictions,” he wrote.

“These concerns auger in favor of judicial deliberation. There is an immeasurable societal benefit of maintaining the immediate status quo while the process of judicial review takes place.”

your ad here

Judge Again Halts High-Capacity Magazine Sales in California

A federal judge on Friday halted sales of high-capacity ammunition magazines in California, giving state officials a chance to appeal his order last week that allowed their sale for the first time in nearly 20 years.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez barred further sales until the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considers whether to reinstate the state’s ban on magazines holding more than 10 bullets.

But the judge said those who bought the extended magazines since his initial order a week ago may keep them without fear of being prosecuted while the appeal proceeds.

A week of sales

Hundreds of thousands of gun owners may have bought the magazines since Benitez threw out the state’s ban last week as infringing on their Second Amendment right to bear arms, said Chuck Michel, an attorney for the National Rifle Association and the California Rifle & Pistol Association who filed the lawsuit that led to the ruling.

Under Benitez’s order, no one in California is permitted to manufacture, import, buy or sell large-capacity magazines as of 5 p.m. Friday.

California has prohibited such magazines since 2000, though people who had the magazines before then were allowed to keep them. Benitez last week threw out both the 2000 law and a 2016 law and ballot measure banning possession even by those who had owned them legally.

“All the people who bought the magazines in the last week are protected from prosecution, but any further purchase of these magazines is illegal for the moment,” Michel said. “There was 20 years of pent up demand for these self-defense tools, and several hundred thousand people bought them in the last week, maybe more than several hundred thousand.”

Difficult to take back

Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who sought the stay, warned in a court filing that it would be difficult for the state to remove the newly purchased magazines, even if the ban is reinstated.

Becerra cited a half-dozen mass shootings nationwide since 2011 where the killers used large-capacity magazines.

“California leads the nation when it comes to common-sense gun laws. We should all be ensuring the safety of our communities, not fighting against long-standing laws that improve public safety,” Becerra said in a statement. He added that he’s confident the ban is constitutional.

Benitez acknowledged in his six-page stay order that other judges, in California and elsewhere, have upheld bans on high-capacity magazines.

“The Court understands that strong emotions are felt by people of good will on both sides of the Constitutional and social policy questions. The Court understands that thoughtful and law-abiding citizens can and do firmly hold competing opinions on firearm magazine restrictions,” he wrote.

“These concerns auger in favor of judicial deliberation. There is an immeasurable societal benefit of maintaining the immediate status quo while the process of judicial review takes place.”

your ad here

Iowa Dream Home Destroyed by Flooding: ‘This is Hard to Take’

Rick Eppenbaugh thought he had seen it all. He served in the Marines and now works with troubled teens. However, nothing prepared him for the flood that invaded his life, engulfing his home and everything around it near Pacific Junction, Iowa.

“I’ve always been a pretty hardcore guy, being in the military and working with street kids. That’s what I do. (I) was kind of a street kid myself. I was a pretty tough guy, but this is hard to take, pretty hard to take.”

Many homes are unlivable in the U.S. Midwest, especially those located within a few kilometers of a stream or river. Eppenbaugh said last summer was unusually wet and a March storm, combined with fluctuating temperatures, caused the winter snow to quickly melt and overwhelm the levees, flooding roads, farmland and homes.

 

WATCH: Water Came up Fast, Destroyed Iowa Dream Home

Evacuation by boat

Eppenbaugh was surprised the water rose so quickly.

“There was water over the road already in half an hour from when the levy breached. It covered a mile, a mile and a half, flooded all (the) fields, flooded the interstate,” Eppenbaugh said.

He, his wife and five dogs were eventually evacuated by boat, but they had to leave his wife’s two beloved horses behind.

“They were standing out front when we got in that boat and motored away. No one’s seen them alive or dead,” Eppenbaugh said.

The family is temporarily living in a home in Omaha owned by Eppenbaugh’s boss. However, the farm dogs are cooped up in the house and unused to living in the city, and Eppenbaugh is anxious to start rebuilding his house.

Water rose high

On his second trip home after the flood, he and two friends, with a borrowed rowboat, slowly made their way across what looks like a lake. The only sign that they are actually over flooded farmland are the corn stalks that occasionally poke out of the water.

He had always dreamed of owning a home in the countryside. He realized that dream six years ago when his children were grown and had their own homes. He and his wife bought a farmhouse built in 1924, just a 30 minute drive from the city of Omaha.

“I used to just sit out here at night. Stars were real bright. Dogs are running around,” Eppenbaugh said.

The water had receded enough that Eppenbaugh’s home looked like it was on an island. From the waterlines seen inside the walls of the house, the water rose to about 30 centimeters below the ceiling. Everything on his first floor had been underwater. His refrigerator was now on its side. Precious family photos were wet and ruined.

“Until you start looking, you don’t really even know what you’ve lost,” Eppenbaugh said, as he looked around to see what he could salvage.

He said he will have to replace his floors, walls and he hopes the foundation is still good.

“All the money we put in this place in the last six years is just wasted,” he said.

​‘It’s so overwhelming’

Eppenbaugh calmly looked around, but did not reflect the shock he had been experiencing since the flood.

“I’ve been crying for two weeks. Trust me, it’s not that calm of a deal. It’s just … it’s so overwhelming.”

After picking up a few things, Eppenbaugh had to walk and row away, until the water receded.

No one in the area had flood insurance. He said it’s too expensive. Eppenbaugh estimated it may take up to a year to rebuild his home piece by piece.

“It’s pretty overwhelming. You just kind of feel numb.”

your ad here

Istanbul Candidate: Recount Could Bring ‘Dangerous’ Changes

“I am not worried about voting results,” said Ekrem Imamoglu, the opposition mayoral candidate in Istanbul. “I am worried about a system being poorly managed.” He spoke to VOA on Friday as elections officials conducted a recount of last Sunday’s vote.

Friday was the fifth day of uncertainty about which candidate would take over the leadership of the city of 15 million. The vote was close, with Imamoglu, of the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), narrowly leading the ruling AK Party candidate, former Prime Minister Binali Yildirim. 

On Tuesday the AK Party, with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the head, filed an appeal to contest the vote in Istanbul, saying there had been irregularities and demanding a recount.

“The AK Party officials who spoke on behalf of the government contradicted their own statements,” Imamoglu told VOA. “Three days before the elections, they called the election system unfailing. Now they call it doubtful. If the Election Board comes up with new practices such as recounting invalid votes, it will open the way for other abuses. Then there would be no point in holding elections at all.”

The AK Party’s representative on the election board, Recep Ozel, on Thursday told Turkish broadcaster A Haber that as the vote recount progressed, the difference between the vote totals would drop and his candidate, Yildirim, would emerge the winner.

Communications professor Baris Doster of Istanbul’s Marmara University told VOA earlier this week that Istanbul usually leads the nation in political change. 

“Results of Istanbul’s local elections are so important for Turkish politics because Istanbul is the greatest city, traditionally, politically, culturally and economically,” he said.

Imamoglu says allowing the elections system to be manipulated by complaints of abuse “would be irreversibly dangerous.” He said the current recount is engendering mistrust in the Turkish elections system.

He also said when his party complained about irregularities in the past, the allegations were rejected.

Critics of the ruling party are skeptical that Imamoglu will ever be allowed to take office, even if the vote results are verified. 

Linda Hintz, assistant professor of international relations at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., told VOA this week that in the past, the AK Party has strategically implied that some political figures have terrorist connections in order to remove them from office. She said Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu has promised that no one with connections to terrorism will be allowed to govern.

Political observers say that regardless of the outcome of the Istanbul mayoral race, close races there and in two other major cities — Ankara and Izmir —  amount to a setback for Erdogan, who has enjoyed popular support in the past. 

The political issues, however, are unavoidable to everyday Turks. The country is in the grip of a recession, with inflation at nearly 20 percent and unemployment approaching record numbers. Food prices are rising by close to 30 percent.

Further, the mayorship of Istanbul has symbolic importance. Erdogan held the office from 1994 to 1998, at the beginning of his political career.

your ad here

Istanbul Candidate: Recount Could Bring ‘Dangerous’ Changes

“I am not worried about voting results,” said Ekrem Imamoglu, the opposition mayoral candidate in Istanbul. “I am worried about a system being poorly managed.” He spoke to VOA on Friday as elections officials conducted a recount of last Sunday’s vote.

Friday was the fifth day of uncertainty about which candidate would take over the leadership of the city of 15 million. The vote was close, with Imamoglu, of the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), narrowly leading the ruling AK Party candidate, former Prime Minister Binali Yildirim. 

On Tuesday the AK Party, with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the head, filed an appeal to contest the vote in Istanbul, saying there had been irregularities and demanding a recount.

“The AK Party officials who spoke on behalf of the government contradicted their own statements,” Imamoglu told VOA. “Three days before the elections, they called the election system unfailing. Now they call it doubtful. If the Election Board comes up with new practices such as recounting invalid votes, it will open the way for other abuses. Then there would be no point in holding elections at all.”

The AK Party’s representative on the election board, Recep Ozel, on Thursday told Turkish broadcaster A Haber that as the vote recount progressed, the difference between the vote totals would drop and his candidate, Yildirim, would emerge the winner.

Communications professor Baris Doster of Istanbul’s Marmara University told VOA earlier this week that Istanbul usually leads the nation in political change. 

“Results of Istanbul’s local elections are so important for Turkish politics because Istanbul is the greatest city, traditionally, politically, culturally and economically,” he said.

Imamoglu says allowing the elections system to be manipulated by complaints of abuse “would be irreversibly dangerous.” He said the current recount is engendering mistrust in the Turkish elections system.

He also said when his party complained about irregularities in the past, the allegations were rejected.

Critics of the ruling party are skeptical that Imamoglu will ever be allowed to take office, even if the vote results are verified. 

Linda Hintz, assistant professor of international relations at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., told VOA this week that in the past, the AK Party has strategically implied that some political figures have terrorist connections in order to remove them from office. She said Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu has promised that no one with connections to terrorism will be allowed to govern.

Political observers say that regardless of the outcome of the Istanbul mayoral race, close races there and in two other major cities — Ankara and Izmir —  amount to a setback for Erdogan, who has enjoyed popular support in the past. 

The political issues, however, are unavoidable to everyday Turks. The country is in the grip of a recession, with inflation at nearly 20 percent and unemployment approaching record numbers. Food prices are rising by close to 30 percent.

Further, the mayorship of Istanbul has symbolic importance. Erdogan held the office from 1994 to 1998, at the beginning of his political career.

your ad here

US Revokes Visa of Chief Prosecutor of International Court

Cindy Saine at the State Department and Margaret Besheer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

The United States has revoked the visa of the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, over a possible investigation of U.S. soldiers’ actions in Afghanistan.

Bensouda’s office said Friday that U.S. authorities revoked the prosecutor’s visa for entry into the United States, and a U.S. State Department spokesperson confirmed the action.

The spokesperson said Friday, “The United States will take the necessary steps to protect its sovereignty and to protect our people from unjust investigation and prosecution by the International Criminal Court [ICC].”

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last month that the United States would revoke or deny visas to ICC staff investigating possible war crimes by U.S. forces.

The United States in not a member of the ICC, along with Russia and China.

Bensouda’s office said that Bensouda, a Gambian national, would exercise her duties as ICC prosecutor “without fear or favor.”

It said the U.S. decision was not expected to impact Bensouda’s travels to the United Nations in New York where she gives regular briefings to the U.N. Security Council.

U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said: “We very much hope [the United States] will honor the agreement” for ICC staff members to travel to the United Nations. 

Bensouda is expected to brief the U.N. Security Council next month about her investigations in Libya. 

ICC judges have been reviewing materials on possible war crimes committed by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, but have yet to make a decision on whether to open a formal investigation into the matter.

The ICC, located in The Hague, prosecutes crimes only when other nations are unwilling or unable to bring suspects to justice.

your ad here