Former Trump Adviser Flynn Asks for Further Sentencing Delay

Lawyers for former Trump administration national security adviser Michael Flynn say he doesn’t want to be sentenced yet because he has more cooperation to offer.

 

Flynn is expected to be a witness in a trial later this year in Virginia related to foreign lobbying work. He asked Tuesday for a sentencing date to be pushed off into the future.

 

Flynn was supposed to be sentenced last December for lying to the FBI but asked for a postponement so he could continue cooperating and earn credit toward a lighter sentence.

 

Prosecutors with special counsel Robert Mueller’s took no position on Flynn’s request but said they viewed his cooperation as effectively complete.

your ad here

New Pentagon Transgender Rule Sets Limits for Troops

The Defense Department has approved a new policy that will largely bar transgender troops and military recruits from transitioning to another sex, and require most individuals to serve in their birth gender.

The memo outlining the new policy was obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press, and it comes after a lengthy and complicated legal battle. It falls short of the all-out transgender ban that was initially ordered by President Donald Trump. But it will likely force the military to eventually discharge transgender individuals who need hormone treatments or surgery and can’t or won’t serve in their birth gender.

The order says the military services must implement the new policy in 30 days, giving some individuals a short window of time to qualify for gender transition if needed. And it allows service secretaries to waive the policy on a case-by-case basis.

Under the new rules, currently serving transgender troops and anyone who has signed an enlistment contract by April 12 may continue with plans for hormone treatments and gender transition if they have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

But after April 12, no one with gender dysphoria who is taking hormones or has transitioned to another gender will be allowed to enlist. And any currently serving troops diagnosed with gender dysphoria after April 12 will have to serve in their birth gender and will be barred from taking hormones or getting transition surgery.

The memo lays out guidelines for discharging service members based on the new policy. It says a service member can be discharged based on a diagnosis of gender dysphoria if he or she is “unable or unwilling to adhere to all applicable standards, including the standards associated with his or her biological sex, or seeks transition to another gender.”

It adds that troops must be formally counseled and given a chance to change their decision before the discharge is finalized.

The final legal injunction blocking the new policy was lifted last week, allowing the Pentagon to move forward. But restrictions on transgender troops are likely to face ongoing legal challenges and have been slammed by members of Congress as discriminatory and self-defeating.

The memo was signed by David L. Norquist, who is currently serving as the deputy defense secretary.

Criticism of new rule

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., said in January that barring service by transgender individuals “would cost us recruits at a time when so few Americans are willing to serve.” She spoke at a hearing in which transgender troops testified that transitioning to another sex made them stronger and more effective members of the military.

Until a few years ago service members could be discharged from the military for being transgender, but that changed under the Obama administration. Then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced in 2016 that transgender people already serving in the military would be allowed to serve openly. And the military set July 1, 2017, as the date when transgender individuals would be allowed to enlist.

After Trump took office, however, his administration delayed the enlistment date and called for additional study to determine if allowing transgender individuals to serve would affect military readiness or effectiveness.

A few weeks later, Trump caught military leaders by surprise, tweeting that the government won’t accept or allow transgender individuals to serve “in any capacity” in the military. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail,” he wrote.

His demand for a ban triggered a legal and moral quagmire, as the Pentagon faced the prospect of throwing out service members who had willingly come forward as transgender after being promised they would be protected and allowed to serve. And as legal battles blocked the ban from taking effect, the Obama-era policy continued and transgender individuals were allowed to begin enlisting in the military a little more than a year ago.

Numbers, cost

An estimated 14,700 troops on active duty and in the Reserves identify as transgender, but not all seek treatment. Since July 2016, more than 1,500 service members were diagnosed with gender dysphoria; as of Feb. 1, there were 1,071 currently serving. According to the Pentagon, the department has spent about $8 million on transgender care since 2016. The military’s annual health care budget tops $50 billion.

Last year, all four service chiefs told Congress that they had seen no discipline, morale or unit readiness problems with transgender troops serving openly in the military. But they also acknowledged that some commanders were spending a lot of time with transgender individuals who were working through medical requirements and other transition issues.

The five transgender troops who testified in January said their medical transitions took anywhere from four weeks to four months and they did most of it on their own time. All said they were fit to return to deploying afterward.

your ad here

Trump Proposes Trimming Missile Defense as North Korea Pushes Ahead

Just when it looks like North Korean leader Kim Jong Un may restart his ballistic missile testing program, U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed trimming the missile defense budget, as one set of deterrents is delayed by two years.

The U.S. Missile Defense Agency — charged with developing, testing and fielding a ballistic missile defense system — will delay the expansion of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system by two years because of a delay in the redesign of the Raytheon Co-made “kill vehicle” the system uses.

A “kill vehicle” pops off the top of the defending missile above the Earth’s atmosphere and seeks out and destroys the attacking missile’s warhead.

The GMD is a network of radars, anti-ballistic missiles based in Alaska and California, and other equipment designed to protect the United States from intercontinental ballistic missiles, or ICBMS.

The expansion of the field of interceptors in Alaska from 44 ground-based interceptors, or GBIs, to 64 had been slated for completion in 2023. But the delay, due to technical issues and not connected to the cut in the agency’s budget, now means that the placement of the additional 20 interceptors will not be operational until 2025, the MDA said Tuesday.

“The important thing is to get it right, and if we’re going to build more GBIs, we want to put the best kill vehicle on the top of it,” said Tom Karako, a missile defense expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

At the same time, North Korea has been pushing ahead with its nuclear weapons program after a summit meeting between Kim and Trump in Hanoi ended abruptly on Feb. 28 without an agreement on denuclearization.

New activity has been detected at a North Korean ICBM plant, South Korean media said Thursday, as Trump said he would be “very disappointed” if Pyongyang rebuilt a rocket site.

In the budget, the Missile Defense Agency, or MDA, saw its appropriation cut by $1 billion to $9.4 billion.

Previous budget boost

Michelle Atkinson, chief financial officer of the MDA, told reporters, “What you are seeing in ’20 actually looks like a decrease, but it’s really just the declining funding,” as the agency comes off recent financial injections.

Trump’s smaller request comes on the heels of a significant budget boost last year after several North Korean missile tests.

The MDA projected a budget of $9.2 billion in 2021, and $9.1 billion in 2022, continuing the trend of declining funding.

One Pentagon-wide effort in lasers that could be used to defeat missiles saw investment slow dramatically. After nearly doubling just the MDA’s budget for directed energy from $109 million in 2018 to $224 million in 2019, the Pentagon as a whole plans to invest only $235 million in the technology in fiscal 2020.

Among other proposals included in a recently published Missile Defense Review is one involving lasers mounted on drones — aimed at stopping missiles just after takeoff in what is called the boost phase.

During this portion of the flight the missile is most vulnerable, flying at its slowest speed, easily detected by the heat from its engines and incapable of evading interceptors as it accelerates to break out of the Earth’s atmosphere.

your ad here

Iranian Lawyers Join Global Backlash to Iran’s Sentencing of Rights Defender

A group of Iranian lawyers has added its voice to international criticism of Tehran for sentencing a female colleague to additional years in prison in relation to her work in defending Iranian rights activists.

In an open letter to the Iranian people dated Tuesday and sent by one of the authors to VOA Persian, the group of 16 lawyers said the multiyear sentencing of lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh, announced by Iranian state media Monday, violates the Iranian constitution’s commitments to human rights and fair trials.

“It is a source of shame and shows a lack of tolerance in dealing with lawyers who are critical of the system, a sign of the weakness of the judiciary,” said the letter, also published online by Iran’s Human Rights Activist News Agency.

“We praise Sotoudeh’s integrity, passion and independence in fighting for justice and human rights, and call for her unjust sentence to be overturned,” added the lawyers.

Sotoudeh was arrested at her home last June after she defended women detained earlier in the year for staging street protests against Iran’s compulsory hijab law. In reports published Monday, Iranian state media quoted judge Mohammad Moghiseh as saying Sotoudeh was sentenced to seven years in prison: five years for “crimes against national security” and two years for “insulting” Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

At the time of her 2018 arrest, Iranian authorities informed Sotoudeh that she also had been found guilty in absentia of espionage and sentenced to five years in prison in that case.

London-based rights group Amnesty International posted a Monday report saying authorities at Tehran’s Evin prison, where Sotoudeh is jailed, informed her this week that her new sentence was 33 years and 148 lashes for a case involving seven security-related offenses.

Amnesty said it was not clear if Moghiseh’s announcement of a seven-year prison term for Sotoudeh was related to the case involving the seven charges. “If [Moghiseh’s] report was referring to the same case, Amnesty International cannot currently explain why the information appears to contradict that provided to Sotoudeh by the office for the implementation of sentences in Evin prison,” the group said.

In a Facebook post Monday, Sotoudeh’s husband Reza Khandan wrote that his wife has been sentenced to a total of 38 years in prison and 148 lashes, with five years for a first case and 33 years for the second. His reference to a “first case” appeared to match the five-year sentence for espionage, handed down to Sotoudeh in absentia last year. Khandan told the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) that he got the figures from Sotoudeh in a phone call that lasted only a few minutes without time to get into details.

​International backlash

U.S. State Department Deputy Spokesman Robert Palladino criticized the latest sentencing of Sotoudeh, sarcastically asking Khamenei whether it marks the “new era of justice” that he talks about.

In a Tuesday statement, the EU described Sotoudeh’s sentencing as a “worrying development.”

“The EU expects an immediate review of her sentence as well as the conviction of her husband Reza Khandan, who was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment in January 2019,” an EU spokesperson said. “The European Union also expects Iran to ensure that both Khandan and Sotoudeh’s right to appeal their sentences is protected.”

Amnesty denounced Sotoudeh’s sentencing in stronger terms.

“It is absolutely shocking that Sotoudeh is facing nearly four decades in jail and 148 lashes for her peaceful human rights work, including her defense of women protesting against Iran’s degrading forced hijab [veiling] laws,” said Philip Luther, the group’s Middle East research director. “Sotoudeh must be released immediately and unconditionally and this obscene sentence quashed without delay.”

There was no immediate response by the Iranian government to the international backlash against Sotoudeh’s new sentence. Sotoudeh previously served three years in prison from 2010 to 2013 for security-related charges relating to her human rights work, which has won her several international accolades.

This article originated in VOA’s Persian Service. Shahram Bahraminejad contributed from Washington.

your ad here

Iranian Lawyers Join Global Backlash to Iran’s Sentencing of Rights Defender

A group of Iranian lawyers has added its voice to international criticism of Tehran for sentencing a female colleague to additional years in prison in relation to her work in defending Iranian rights activists.

In an open letter to the Iranian people dated Tuesday and sent by one of the authors to VOA Persian, the group of 16 lawyers said the multiyear sentencing of lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh, announced by Iranian state media Monday, violates the Iranian constitution’s commitments to human rights and fair trials.

“It is a source of shame and shows a lack of tolerance in dealing with lawyers who are critical of the system, a sign of the weakness of the judiciary,” said the letter, also published online by Iran’s Human Rights Activist News Agency.

“We praise Sotoudeh’s integrity, passion and independence in fighting for justice and human rights, and call for her unjust sentence to be overturned,” added the lawyers.

Sotoudeh was arrested at her home last June after she defended women detained earlier in the year for staging street protests against Iran’s compulsory hijab law. In reports published Monday, Iranian state media quoted judge Mohammad Moghiseh as saying Sotoudeh was sentenced to seven years in prison: five years for “crimes against national security” and two years for “insulting” Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

At the time of her 2018 arrest, Iranian authorities informed Sotoudeh that she also had been found guilty in absentia of espionage and sentenced to five years in prison in that case.

London-based rights group Amnesty International posted a Monday report saying authorities at Tehran’s Evin prison, where Sotoudeh is jailed, informed her this week that her new sentence was 33 years and 148 lashes for a case involving seven security-related offenses.

Amnesty said it was not clear if Moghiseh’s announcement of a seven-year prison term for Sotoudeh was related to the case involving the seven charges. “If [Moghiseh’s] report was referring to the same case, Amnesty International cannot currently explain why the information appears to contradict that provided to Sotoudeh by the office for the implementation of sentences in Evin prison,” the group said.

In a Facebook post Monday, Sotoudeh’s husband Reza Khandan wrote that his wife has been sentenced to a total of 38 years in prison and 148 lashes, with five years for a first case and 33 years for the second. His reference to a “first case” appeared to match the five-year sentence for espionage, handed down to Sotoudeh in absentia last year. Khandan told the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) that he got the figures from Sotoudeh in a phone call that lasted only a few minutes without time to get into details.

​International backlash

U.S. State Department Deputy Spokesman Robert Palladino criticized the latest sentencing of Sotoudeh, sarcastically asking Khamenei whether it marks the “new era of justice” that he talks about.

In a Tuesday statement, the EU described Sotoudeh’s sentencing as a “worrying development.”

“The EU expects an immediate review of her sentence as well as the conviction of her husband Reza Khandan, who was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment in January 2019,” an EU spokesperson said. “The European Union also expects Iran to ensure that both Khandan and Sotoudeh’s right to appeal their sentences is protected.”

Amnesty denounced Sotoudeh’s sentencing in stronger terms.

“It is absolutely shocking that Sotoudeh is facing nearly four decades in jail and 148 lashes for her peaceful human rights work, including her defense of women protesting against Iran’s degrading forced hijab [veiling] laws,” said Philip Luther, the group’s Middle East research director. “Sotoudeh must be released immediately and unconditionally and this obscene sentence quashed without delay.”

There was no immediate response by the Iranian government to the international backlash against Sotoudeh’s new sentence. Sotoudeh previously served three years in prison from 2010 to 2013 for security-related charges relating to her human rights work, which has won her several international accolades.

This article originated in VOA’s Persian Service. Shahram Bahraminejad contributed from Washington.

your ad here

US Official: Iranian Regime Wants Iraq to Become a Province of Iran   

U.S. Special Representative for Iran, Brian Hook, blasted Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s visit to Iraq and accused his government of trying to control Iraq by fueling sectarian conflict in the country.

In an interview with Alhurrha TV, Hook said Rouhani’s visit is not in the best interest of the Iraqi people, adding that Iran does not support the security and sovereignty of Iraq. 

“When President Rouhani comes into Iraq, you have to question the motive,” Hook said Monday. “I think what Iran would ultimately like to see happen is Iraq turn into a province of Iran so that they can create a military highway across the northern Middle East that the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps can use to ferry missiles and weapons.”

Hook said Iran is “the last revolutionary regime on earth,” and it is trying to further destabilize the Middle East by reinforcing the sectarian divide. 

“The Iranian regime wants to replace a national identity. They want to dissolve it and replace it with a Shi’ite identity. This has been the core of their foreign policy to create sectarian divisions. They want to do that in Iraq, as well.” 

The U.S. official’s comments come as Rouhani arrived in Baghdad Monday and met with his counterpart, President Barham Salih, as a part of his three-day state visit to Iraq aimed at bolstering Tehran’s influence and increasing commercial ties with Iraq. 

According to Iraqi and Iranian officials, Rouhani and his delegation of 32 business people have signed several preliminary trade deals with Iraqi officials, including a major plan to build a railway linking the neighbors and easing visa restrictions.

“At a time when the United States is seeking to pressure the Iranian nation with its unjust sanctions, we need to develop and deepen our relations to stand against them,” Rouhani said.

Rouhani claimed “world powers” were behind terrorism in the Middle East, adding that “Zionism and those who want to dominate the wealth of the countries of the region” were the root causes of instability.  He said his country played a key role in helping Iraq defeat the Islamic State, but more work was needed to achieve regional stability.

“Today, Iran and Iraq are enjoying the closest relations with each other,” he stressed.

The Iraqi government, which is now trying to eliminate IS insurgents after regaining control of all its territory under the group, says good relations with Iran is key for accomplishing full stability. 

While hosting Rouhani Monday, President Barham Salih thanked Iran for its support during Iraq’s fight against IS and stressed the need for future cooperation.

“The victory that was achieved against IS in Iraq was an important and huge victory, but incomplete, as the eradication of that sick, deviated line of thought and extremism requires more sustainable regional efforts and cooperation,” Salih said.

​Iran-Iraq relations

Some experts see Rouhani’s visit as an attempt by Iran and Iraq to take their relations to the next level as the fight against IS calms down in the region. 

Randa Slim, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, told VOA that Iranian officials hope the visit can accomplish three goals: strengthening and deepening Iran-Iraq relations; sending a strong signal to the U.S. and Iraq’s neighbors about the scope and breadth of Iran’s relations in Iran; and messaging Iranian audiences about the success of Iranian foreign policy in the Middle East.

“Iran’s influence in Iraq has so far been mainly deployed through military means, either by offering direct assistance to Iraqi forces in their fight against ISIS, and mainly by training and assisting Iraqi militias. This visit might be the beginning of shifting this relationship to a state-to-state level, hopefully introducing some checks and balances on what has so far been unrestrained and unaccountable action by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard,” Slim said.

Other experts, however, say deepening relations between Iran and Iraq face some challenges. Iraqi officials will ultimately find themselves between two countries with great influence but conflicting interests. 

Naysan Rafati, the Crisis Group’s Iran analyst, told VOA that Iran could try to extend its influence in Iraq from the military to other areas such as culture, a move that might threaten U.S. interests in the region.  

“Iran is certainly playing the long game in Iraq, which is what you’d expect, given their history and the fact that they’re neighbors,” Rafati said.  

“But as the U.S. tries to check Iran’s regional influence, Iraq could increasingly emerge as a theater for rivalry between Tehran and Washington,” he added.

your ad here

US Official: Iranian Regime Wants Iraq to Become a Province of Iran   

U.S. Special Representative for Iran, Brian Hook, blasted Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s visit to Iraq and accused his government of trying to control Iraq by fueling sectarian conflict in the country.

In an interview with Alhurrha TV, Hook said Rouhani’s visit is not in the best interest of the Iraqi people, adding that Iran does not support the security and sovereignty of Iraq. 

“When President Rouhani comes into Iraq, you have to question the motive,” Hook said Monday. “I think what Iran would ultimately like to see happen is Iraq turn into a province of Iran so that they can create a military highway across the northern Middle East that the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps can use to ferry missiles and weapons.”

Hook said Iran is “the last revolutionary regime on earth,” and it is trying to further destabilize the Middle East by reinforcing the sectarian divide. 

“The Iranian regime wants to replace a national identity. They want to dissolve it and replace it with a Shi’ite identity. This has been the core of their foreign policy to create sectarian divisions. They want to do that in Iraq, as well.” 

The U.S. official’s comments come as Rouhani arrived in Baghdad Monday and met with his counterpart, President Barham Salih, as a part of his three-day state visit to Iraq aimed at bolstering Tehran’s influence and increasing commercial ties with Iraq. 

According to Iraqi and Iranian officials, Rouhani and his delegation of 32 business people have signed several preliminary trade deals with Iraqi officials, including a major plan to build a railway linking the neighbors and easing visa restrictions.

“At a time when the United States is seeking to pressure the Iranian nation with its unjust sanctions, we need to develop and deepen our relations to stand against them,” Rouhani said.

Rouhani claimed “world powers” were behind terrorism in the Middle East, adding that “Zionism and those who want to dominate the wealth of the countries of the region” were the root causes of instability.  He said his country played a key role in helping Iraq defeat the Islamic State, but more work was needed to achieve regional stability.

“Today, Iran and Iraq are enjoying the closest relations with each other,” he stressed.

The Iraqi government, which is now trying to eliminate IS insurgents after regaining control of all its territory under the group, says good relations with Iran is key for accomplishing full stability. 

While hosting Rouhani Monday, President Barham Salih thanked Iran for its support during Iraq’s fight against IS and stressed the need for future cooperation.

“The victory that was achieved against IS in Iraq was an important and huge victory, but incomplete, as the eradication of that sick, deviated line of thought and extremism requires more sustainable regional efforts and cooperation,” Salih said.

​Iran-Iraq relations

Some experts see Rouhani’s visit as an attempt by Iran and Iraq to take their relations to the next level as the fight against IS calms down in the region. 

Randa Slim, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, told VOA that Iranian officials hope the visit can accomplish three goals: strengthening and deepening Iran-Iraq relations; sending a strong signal to the U.S. and Iraq’s neighbors about the scope and breadth of Iran’s relations in Iran; and messaging Iranian audiences about the success of Iranian foreign policy in the Middle East.

“Iran’s influence in Iraq has so far been mainly deployed through military means, either by offering direct assistance to Iraqi forces in their fight against ISIS, and mainly by training and assisting Iraqi militias. This visit might be the beginning of shifting this relationship to a state-to-state level, hopefully introducing some checks and balances on what has so far been unrestrained and unaccountable action by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard,” Slim said.

Other experts, however, say deepening relations between Iran and Iraq face some challenges. Iraqi officials will ultimately find themselves between two countries with great influence but conflicting interests. 

Naysan Rafati, the Crisis Group’s Iran analyst, told VOA that Iran could try to extend its influence in Iraq from the military to other areas such as culture, a move that might threaten U.S. interests in the region.  

“Iran is certainly playing the long game in Iraq, which is what you’d expect, given their history and the fact that they’re neighbors,” Rafati said.  

“But as the U.S. tries to check Iran’s regional influence, Iraq could increasingly emerge as a theater for rivalry between Tehran and Washington,” he added.

your ad here

Sudan, Ethiopia to Deploy Joint Forces to Secure Border

Sudan and Ethiopia signed an agreement Tuesday to deploy joint forces along their border to prevent weapons smuggling and sporadic skirmishes between armed groups from both sides, state media said.

The setting up of a joint border protection force comes after a series of high-level talks between officials from the neighboring countries over several months.

“The Sudanese and Ethiopian defense ministries signed today a protocol to deploy joint troops along the border to control smuggling, illegal immigration and cross-border crimes,” Sudan’s official SUNA news agency reported.

“The joint force will secure the border and the people living along the frontier on both the sides,” General Kamal Abdelmarouf, chief of staff of Sudan’s army, said during the signing ceremony, according to SUNA.

Security officers from both countries regularly complain about weapons smuggling and cross-border crimes along the frontier.

Khartoum and Addis Ababa share close diplomatic ties, but issues concerning some border areas have been a source of tension between the two.

Sudanese farmers often accuse their Ethiopian counterparts of occupying vast agricultural lands in some areas along the Sudanese border state of Gadaref.

The Sudanese farmers also allege that Ethiopian rebels are involved in several cross-border crimes inside Sudanese territory.

Ethiopian media, meanwhile, claims that on several occasions weapons allegedly smuggled from Sudan into Ethiopia have been caught by security forces inside Ethiopian territory.

your ad here

Sudan, Ethiopia to Deploy Joint Forces to Secure Border

Sudan and Ethiopia signed an agreement Tuesday to deploy joint forces along their border to prevent weapons smuggling and sporadic skirmishes between armed groups from both sides, state media said.

The setting up of a joint border protection force comes after a series of high-level talks between officials from the neighboring countries over several months.

“The Sudanese and Ethiopian defense ministries signed today a protocol to deploy joint troops along the border to control smuggling, illegal immigration and cross-border crimes,” Sudan’s official SUNA news agency reported.

“The joint force will secure the border and the people living along the frontier on both the sides,” General Kamal Abdelmarouf, chief of staff of Sudan’s army, said during the signing ceremony, according to SUNA.

Security officers from both countries regularly complain about weapons smuggling and cross-border crimes along the frontier.

Khartoum and Addis Ababa share close diplomatic ties, but issues concerning some border areas have been a source of tension between the two.

Sudanese farmers often accuse their Ethiopian counterparts of occupying vast agricultural lands in some areas along the Sudanese border state of Gadaref.

The Sudanese farmers also allege that Ethiopian rebels are involved in several cross-border crimes inside Sudanese territory.

Ethiopian media, meanwhile, claims that on several occasions weapons allegedly smuggled from Sudan into Ethiopia have been caught by security forces inside Ethiopian territory.

your ad here

Women’s Participation in Politics Rising Globally, But Slowly

The number of women participating in politics globally is rising, but slowly, says a new report from the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

The report found that in 2017, the number of female parliamentarians grew by 1 percentage point over the previous year to nearly 24 percent, while the proportion of female ministers is at an all-time high at almost 21 percent.

“The fact that 75 percent of legislators are men, really?” Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, executive director of U.N. Women, said at a joint press conference with the head of the IPU to launch the report Tuesday. “That’s a lot of men making laws for all of us.”

There is also a shift afoot in the kinds of portfolios female ministers hold, noted IPU President Gabriela Cuevas Barron.

“Women continue to hold portfolios considered ‘soft’ on social affairs or family, children or youth, however, the trade industry portfolio is among the top five ministries held by women globally for the first time,” Cuevas said. “Strikingly, more women are in charge of portfolios traditionally occupied by men compared to 2017.”

She said that globally in 2018, 30 percent more women ministers covered defense, 52.9 percent more covered finance, and 13.6 percent more covered foreign affairs compared to the previous year.

On the flip side, IPU said women’s participation in top-level leadership is down from 7.2 percent of elected heads of state to 6.6 percent, and from 5.7 percent of heads of government to 5.2 percent. There are also 11 countries that have no female ministers.

Quotas

A key factor in improving female participation in politics and reaching gender parity is quota systems.

“The analysis shows that countries with well-designed gender quotas elected significantly more women to parliament than those without,” said IPU’s Cuevas. “It’s absolutely clear that legal quotas, that affirmative action — when it is well-designed — it really changes our reality.”

She said that if women can bring institutional changes, then cultural changes will follow.

However, quota systems only work when they are implemented.

“We have almost perfect legislation when it comes to gender equality, it’s the implementation that is lacking,” Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic told reporters. “We have the quota system in parliament, however, none of the parties respect it.”

She said the last Croatian elections showed the number of elected women was the fewest since Croatia’s independence in 1991. “The parties rather pay fines than respect the quotas,” she said.

Croatia ranked 98th out of 191 on the IPU list of women parliamentarians.

‘Radical measures needed’

Iceland, which ranks 21st, has not seen even progress. In 2016, there was nearly gender parity; however, in 2017 elections, the number of women dropped to 38 percent.

“My party has a quota system, the majority of Icelandic political parties have a quota system, but not all of them, and you can actually see from the results of the election how it goes for women,” Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdottir said. “I think radical measures is what is needed, unless we are going to stay here talking about gender inequality for the next century.”

U.N. Women’s Mlambo-Ngcuka agreed.

“We need to make a strong case about democracy being for the people, by the people, not for the people by the men,” she said. “And, therefore, create very concrete thresholds that political parties must cross in order for them to have legitimacy in parliament. If in their own party they are unable to represent most of the people who live in the constituencies that they are trying to lead, we have to question if they really are a true representative of the people.”

your ad here

Women’s Participation in Politics Rising Globally, But Slowly

The number of women participating in politics globally is rising, but slowly, says a new report from the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

The report found that in 2017, the number of female parliamentarians grew by 1 percentage point over the previous year to nearly 24 percent, while the proportion of female ministers is at an all-time high at almost 21 percent.

“The fact that 75 percent of legislators are men, really?” Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, executive director of U.N. Women, said at a joint press conference with the head of the IPU to launch the report Tuesday. “That’s a lot of men making laws for all of us.”

There is also a shift afoot in the kinds of portfolios female ministers hold, noted IPU President Gabriela Cuevas Barron.

“Women continue to hold portfolios considered ‘soft’ on social affairs or family, children or youth, however, the trade industry portfolio is among the top five ministries held by women globally for the first time,” Cuevas said. “Strikingly, more women are in charge of portfolios traditionally occupied by men compared to 2017.”

She said that globally in 2018, 30 percent more women ministers covered defense, 52.9 percent more covered finance, and 13.6 percent more covered foreign affairs compared to the previous year.

On the flip side, IPU said women’s participation in top-level leadership is down from 7.2 percent of elected heads of state to 6.6 percent, and from 5.7 percent of heads of government to 5.2 percent. There are also 11 countries that have no female ministers.

Quotas

A key factor in improving female participation in politics and reaching gender parity is quota systems.

“The analysis shows that countries with well-designed gender quotas elected significantly more women to parliament than those without,” said IPU’s Cuevas. “It’s absolutely clear that legal quotas, that affirmative action — when it is well-designed — it really changes our reality.”

She said that if women can bring institutional changes, then cultural changes will follow.

However, quota systems only work when they are implemented.

“We have almost perfect legislation when it comes to gender equality, it’s the implementation that is lacking,” Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic told reporters. “We have the quota system in parliament, however, none of the parties respect it.”

She said the last Croatian elections showed the number of elected women was the fewest since Croatia’s independence in 1991. “The parties rather pay fines than respect the quotas,” she said.

Croatia ranked 98th out of 191 on the IPU list of women parliamentarians.

‘Radical measures needed’

Iceland, which ranks 21st, has not seen even progress. In 2016, there was nearly gender parity; however, in 2017 elections, the number of women dropped to 38 percent.

“My party has a quota system, the majority of Icelandic political parties have a quota system, but not all of them, and you can actually see from the results of the election how it goes for women,” Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdottir said. “I think radical measures is what is needed, unless we are going to stay here talking about gender inequality for the next century.”

U.N. Women’s Mlambo-Ngcuka agreed.

“We need to make a strong case about democracy being for the people, by the people, not for the people by the men,” she said. “And, therefore, create very concrete thresholds that political parties must cross in order for them to have legitimacy in parliament. If in their own party they are unable to represent most of the people who live in the constituencies that they are trying to lead, we have to question if they really are a true representative of the people.”

your ad here

Ethiopia, France Sign Military, Navy Deal, Turn ‘New Page’ in Ties

Ethiopia and France agreed their first military cooperation accord on Tuesday, a deal that includes helping the landlocked nation build a navy, as Paris seeks to boost economic ties in Africa’s second-most populous country.

On a four-day visit to the Horn of Africa, President Emmanuel Macron is looking to break from France’s colonial history on the continent and nurture relationships in a region where it has lagged behind in recent years.

Macron wants to leverage a mixture of Paris’ soft power in culture and education and its military know-how to give it a foothold at a time when Ethiopia is opening up.

“This unprecedented defense cooperation agreement provides a framework… and notably opens the way for France to assist in establishing an Ethiopian naval component,” Macron told a news conference alongside Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed.

The accord also provides for air cooperation, joint operations and opportunities for training and equipment purchases.

Abiy, who took over as premier in April last year, has presided over major political and economic changes that have included the pardoning of exiled rebel groups and reconciliation with longtime neighboring foe Eritrea.

The country disbanded its navy in 1991 after its then-province Eritrea, which is on the Red Sea, seceded following a three-decade war for independence.

“We are here in a friendly country where we want to strengthen and build a new page in our common history,” Macron said. “Since you became prime minister our vision (of Ethiopia) has profoundly changed.”

He and Abiy also agreed deals to develop Ethiopia’s cultural heritage, including preserving churches and opening an archaeological dig at a 12th century village. Paris will provide 100 million euros to help the country’s economic transition.

Macron was accompanied by a delegation of businessmen, including the chief executive of telecommunications group Orange , Stephane Richard, who is looking to position the company ahead of Ethiopia’s privatization of the sector.

Shipper CMA-CGM and family-owned agri-food group Soufflet are among firms signing deals on Wednesday. A 50-strong French business delegation is due in Addis on Friday.

France’s history in Ethiopia dates back to the start of the 20th century. Its largest embassy compound in the world by size – 43 hectares (106 acres) – was given to it by Emperor Menelik II in 1907. In 1917 it built the rail link between former colony Djibouti and Addis. But these days its influence and business deals fail to rival the likes of China.

“The railway between Djibouti and France is 100 years old and the work that we now want to complete with President Macron is for the long-term. Perhaps in 100 years we’ll talk about it again,” Abiy said.

your ad here

Clashes Erupt After Israel Closes Jerusalem Holy Site

Israeli officials closed Jerusalem’s most sensitive holy site, revered by Jews and Muslims, after a firebomb was thrown at a police station on the compound.

Police on Tuesday clashed with dozens of Palestinians at the compound revered by Jews as Temple Mount, and by Muslims as Haram al-Sharif or Noble Sanctuary. All worshippers were evacuated from the compound. Police said it would reopen to worshippers and visitors Wednesday.

Israeli police also took the unusual measure of closing all gates to the Old City, allowing only residents access to the Muslim and Christian quarters. 

The incident further heightened tensions at the flashpoint site, home to the Al-Aqsa Mosque and gold-topped Dome of the Rock.

Firas Dibs, spokesman for the Waqf, the Jordanian-appointed Islamic body that administers the site, said at least six Palestinians were arrested and 10 injured in the clashes. But Israeli police would only confirm three arrests.

The closure of the compound drew quick rebuke from leaders around the Muslim world.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas denounced the “dangerous Israeli escalation” and warned of “serious repercussions.”

Abdul Nasser Abul al-Basal, Jordanian minister of Islamic affairs, told state-run Al-Mamlaka TV that the closure was an “attack on religious freedom.”

The United Nations Middle East envoy, Nickolay Mladenov, called for calm.

your ad here

Clashes Erupt After Israel Closes Jerusalem Holy Site

Israeli officials closed Jerusalem’s most sensitive holy site, revered by Jews and Muslims, after a firebomb was thrown at a police station on the compound.

Police on Tuesday clashed with dozens of Palestinians at the compound revered by Jews as Temple Mount, and by Muslims as Haram al-Sharif or Noble Sanctuary. All worshippers were evacuated from the compound. Police said it would reopen to worshippers and visitors Wednesday.

Israeli police also took the unusual measure of closing all gates to the Old City, allowing only residents access to the Muslim and Christian quarters. 

The incident further heightened tensions at the flashpoint site, home to the Al-Aqsa Mosque and gold-topped Dome of the Rock.

Firas Dibs, spokesman for the Waqf, the Jordanian-appointed Islamic body that administers the site, said at least six Palestinians were arrested and 10 injured in the clashes. But Israeli police would only confirm three arrests.

The closure of the compound drew quick rebuke from leaders around the Muslim world.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas denounced the “dangerous Israeli escalation” and warned of “serious repercussions.”

Abdul Nasser Abul al-Basal, Jordanian minister of Islamic affairs, told state-run Al-Mamlaka TV that the closure was an “attack on religious freedom.”

The United Nations Middle East envoy, Nickolay Mladenov, called for calm.

your ad here

British Parliament Rejects May’s Latest Brexit Plan to Split from EU

British lawmakers on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected Prime Minister Theresa May’s latest effort to set the terms of Britain’s Brexit deal to split from the European Union on March 29.

The House of Commons voted 391-242 against May’s plan, setting up a Wednesday vote on whether Britain should quit the 28-nation EU bloc without agreeing on any of the details of its departure. And if that fails, a Thursday vote on whether to ask the EU for more time to negotiate an agreement.

May implored lawmakers to adopt the deal she negotiated Monday with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker for “legally binding changes” to ensure that the border between EU member Ireland and Britain’s Northern Ireland would remain open after Brexit.

But the outcome mirrored a January vote on an earlier plan, which May lost even more decisively, by 230 votes.

After losing again, May, the Conservative Party leader, told the House of Commons, “I continue to believe the best and only way” to quit the EU is “in an orderly way.”

She said the next options “are unenviable choices” — leaving without a deal, or asking for more time to negotiate after already spending months to reach terms of the now-defeated pacts.

Jeremy Corbyn, leader of Britain’s main opposition Labor Party, told the parliamentarians, “The government has now been defeated by an enormous majority. The prime minister has run down the clock, and the clock has run out on her.” He called for a new election.

Before Tuesday’s vote, May told lawmakers, “The danger for those of us who want to deliver, to have faith in the British public and deliver on their vote for Brexit, is that if this vote is not passed tonight, if this deal is not passed, then Brexit could be lost.”

Key opponents to her plan quickly emerged.

Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party said May had only made “limited” progress in negotiating the new terms, and said its 10 members in parliament would vote against her plan.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the EU had made “clear, far-reaching proposals” to address Britain’s concerns about the deal. But she deflected a question about whether she was willing to delay the British exit from the EU if British lawmakers could not agree on a plan.

The original deal, rejected two months ago, called for a backstop agreement that would keep Britain and the EU in a customs union until they agree on a new trade agreement. Opponents in Britain’s parliament said they were concerned about being locked into EU rules instead of being able to gain full control of trade policies.

May said the new terms agreed to Monday would ensure the backstop deal is not a permanent part of Britain’s exit from the EU.

The Labor Party rejected the plan, saying it still does not go far enough to allay its concerns.

Juncker warned that Britain is running out of options.

“It is this deal, or Brexit might not happen at all,” he said.

your ad here

British Parliament Rejects May’s Latest Brexit Plan to Split from EU

British lawmakers on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected Prime Minister Theresa May’s latest effort to set the terms of Britain’s Brexit deal to split from the European Union on March 29.

The House of Commons voted 391-242 against May’s plan, setting up a Wednesday vote on whether Britain should quit the 28-nation EU bloc without agreeing on any of the details of its departure. And if that fails, a Thursday vote on whether to ask the EU for more time to negotiate an agreement.

May implored lawmakers to adopt the deal she negotiated Monday with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker for “legally binding changes” to ensure that the border between EU member Ireland and Britain’s Northern Ireland would remain open after Brexit.

But the outcome mirrored a January vote on an earlier plan, which May lost even more decisively, by 230 votes.

After losing again, May, the Conservative Party leader, told the House of Commons, “I continue to believe the best and only way” to quit the EU is “in an orderly way.”

She said the next options “are unenviable choices” — leaving without a deal, or asking for more time to negotiate after already spending months to reach terms of the now-defeated pacts.

Jeremy Corbyn, leader of Britain’s main opposition Labor Party, told the parliamentarians, “The government has now been defeated by an enormous majority. The prime minister has run down the clock, and the clock has run out on her.” He called for a new election.

Before Tuesday’s vote, May told lawmakers, “The danger for those of us who want to deliver, to have faith in the British public and deliver on their vote for Brexit, is that if this vote is not passed tonight, if this deal is not passed, then Brexit could be lost.”

Key opponents to her plan quickly emerged.

Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party said May had only made “limited” progress in negotiating the new terms, and said its 10 members in parliament would vote against her plan.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the EU had made “clear, far-reaching proposals” to address Britain’s concerns about the deal. But she deflected a question about whether she was willing to delay the British exit from the EU if British lawmakers could not agree on a plan.

The original deal, rejected two months ago, called for a backstop agreement that would keep Britain and the EU in a customs union until they agree on a new trade agreement. Opponents in Britain’s parliament said they were concerned about being locked into EU rules instead of being able to gain full control of trade policies.

May said the new terms agreed to Monday would ensure the backstop deal is not a permanent part of Britain’s exit from the EU.

The Labor Party rejected the plan, saying it still does not go far enough to allay its concerns.

Juncker warned that Britain is running out of options.

“It is this deal, or Brexit might not happen at all,” he said.

your ad here

Turkish-Russian Military Cooperation Deepens Amid US-Turkish Tensions

Russian and Turkish military cooperation is deepening as Ankara’s relationship with Washington deteriorates. Recent joint naval exercises between Russia and Turkey, and increasing military cooperation in Syria, come as NATO allies question Turkey’s allegiance to the Western defense alliance.

A joint naval drill last Friday was part of a broader Turkish national military exercise. While the drills involved only a few ships, analysts have described its political implications as far more significant.

“The realization of the Russian-Turkish common military exercises is a message both for the West and for the region of the Middle East that two sides cooperate,” said Zaur Gasimov, an Istanbul-based analyst for the Max Weber Foundation.

The choice of the Black Sea for the joint exercise also is heavy on political symbolism, given that it is a focal point of tensions between NATO and Russian forces, and it sends a message that likely will not be lost on Turkey’s NATO members, other analysts say.

“This is another confirmation that Turkey is the odd man in the room when it comes to the NATO membership; nearly all people think Turkey is only a member on paper,” said political scientist Cengiz Aktar, adding, “And how successful Moscow has been to cut Turkey from NATO.”

“This is a trend thus far, from being temporary or tactical; this is a long-term strategy of Russia,” added Aktar.

Moscow has been quick to exploit bilateral tensions between Ankara and Washington over myriad differences.

“The unprecedented amelioration of Turkish-Russian cooperation at present should be seen in the context of the unprecedented aggravation of the ties between Ankara and Washington,” Gasimov said.

S-400 missiles

Washington’s backing of Syrian YPG Kurdish forces in the fight against Islamic State has driven bilateral ties between the U.S. and Turkey, a NATO ally, to the breaking point. Ankara has designated the YPG as terrorists linked to the PKK, which has been waging a decades-long insurgency inside Turkey.

Moscow’s sale of its S-400 missiles to Ankara has further ratcheted up Turkish-U.S. tensions. Washington is warning of sanctions if the purchase is completed, saying the weapons threaten NATO defense systems.

Russians believe that Turkey will buy the S-400 and, for Moscow, the deal has a political impact, Gasimov said. “The entire process of sell and buy of S-400 poisoned the shaky ties between Ankara and Washington.”

Syria

While U.S.-Turkish divisions deepen, Ankara and Moscow are increasing cooperation in Syria. Russia and Turkey back rival sides in the civil war but increasingly are working together along with Iran to end the conflict, under the auspices of the so-called “Astana Process.”

This month saw Turkish and Russian forces begin coordinating military patrols in the last Syrian rebel enclave of Idlib. The patrols are part of a more comprehensive agreement hammered out between the Russian and Turkish presidents, Vladimir Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The agreement averted a Syrian regime offensive into the province of Idlib which would have likely triggered a refugee exodus into neighboring Turkey.

However, analysts are questioning the sustainability of Turkish-Russian cooperation in Idlib. “Russians sooner or later will clear Idlib, which is filled with tens of thousands of terrorists,” Aktar said, “and this, the first and foremost point of disagreement between Ankara and Moscow.”

The Turkish-Russian patrols in Idlib came in response to Moscow voicing frustration with Ankara over what Moscow claimed was the failure by Turkey’s armed forces to rein in radical groups in Idlib.

Strategies

For now, however, it appears Moscow’s priority is deepening cooperation with Ankara. Local Turkish media reported Tuesday that Russian and Turkish forces are planning joint patrols in Tel Rifaat, an area controlled by the YPG Kurdish militia. The patrols aim to reduce tensions with the YPG and Turkish troops, which continually skirmish.

Moscow, like Washington, has developed a good relationship with the YPG. The PYD, the political wing of the YPG, has offices in Moscow. Russia, unlike Turkey’s Western allies, has not designated the PKK a terrorist organization. Ankara voices little public criticism of Moscow’s PKK stance, while at the same time castigating its European and American allies for not cracking down enough on the PKK, even though they do categorize the militants as terrorists.

Turkey’s growing alienation from its traditional Western allies seems set to continue given Ankara’s deepening ties with Moscow, and analysts warn of inescapable historical diplomatic realities.

“Historically speaking, since Peter the Great [Russian 18th century leader), Turks and Russians never had any joint strategic objective, never, this is for 300 years,” Aktar said. “Also, it’s not possible now that they start to kiss each other and have joint strategic objectives; these countries will always be regional rivals. Unfortunately, Ankara thinks they can play Russian and Americans against each other; it won’t work.”

your ad here

Turkish-Russian Military Cooperation Deepens Amid US-Turkish Tensions

Russian and Turkish military cooperation is deepening as Ankara’s relationship with Washington deteriorates. Recent joint naval exercises between Russia and Turkey, and increasing military cooperation in Syria, come as NATO allies question Turkey’s allegiance to the Western defense alliance.

A joint naval drill last Friday was part of a broader Turkish national military exercise. While the drills involved only a few ships, analysts have described its political implications as far more significant.

“The realization of the Russian-Turkish common military exercises is a message both for the West and for the region of the Middle East that two sides cooperate,” said Zaur Gasimov, an Istanbul-based analyst for the Max Weber Foundation.

The choice of the Black Sea for the joint exercise also is heavy on political symbolism, given that it is a focal point of tensions between NATO and Russian forces, and it sends a message that likely will not be lost on Turkey’s NATO members, other analysts say.

“This is another confirmation that Turkey is the odd man in the room when it comes to the NATO membership; nearly all people think Turkey is only a member on paper,” said political scientist Cengiz Aktar, adding, “And how successful Moscow has been to cut Turkey from NATO.”

“This is a trend thus far, from being temporary or tactical; this is a long-term strategy of Russia,” added Aktar.

Moscow has been quick to exploit bilateral tensions between Ankara and Washington over myriad differences.

“The unprecedented amelioration of Turkish-Russian cooperation at present should be seen in the context of the unprecedented aggravation of the ties between Ankara and Washington,” Gasimov said.

S-400 missiles

Washington’s backing of Syrian YPG Kurdish forces in the fight against Islamic State has driven bilateral ties between the U.S. and Turkey, a NATO ally, to the breaking point. Ankara has designated the YPG as terrorists linked to the PKK, which has been waging a decades-long insurgency inside Turkey.

Moscow’s sale of its S-400 missiles to Ankara has further ratcheted up Turkish-U.S. tensions. Washington is warning of sanctions if the purchase is completed, saying the weapons threaten NATO defense systems.

Russians believe that Turkey will buy the S-400 and, for Moscow, the deal has a political impact, Gasimov said. “The entire process of sell and buy of S-400 poisoned the shaky ties between Ankara and Washington.”

Syria

While U.S.-Turkish divisions deepen, Ankara and Moscow are increasing cooperation in Syria. Russia and Turkey back rival sides in the civil war but increasingly are working together along with Iran to end the conflict, under the auspices of the so-called “Astana Process.”

This month saw Turkish and Russian forces begin coordinating military patrols in the last Syrian rebel enclave of Idlib. The patrols are part of a more comprehensive agreement hammered out between the Russian and Turkish presidents, Vladimir Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The agreement averted a Syrian regime offensive into the province of Idlib which would have likely triggered a refugee exodus into neighboring Turkey.

However, analysts are questioning the sustainability of Turkish-Russian cooperation in Idlib. “Russians sooner or later will clear Idlib, which is filled with tens of thousands of terrorists,” Aktar said, “and this, the first and foremost point of disagreement between Ankara and Moscow.”

The Turkish-Russian patrols in Idlib came in response to Moscow voicing frustration with Ankara over what Moscow claimed was the failure by Turkey’s armed forces to rein in radical groups in Idlib.

Strategies

For now, however, it appears Moscow’s priority is deepening cooperation with Ankara. Local Turkish media reported Tuesday that Russian and Turkish forces are planning joint patrols in Tel Rifaat, an area controlled by the YPG Kurdish militia. The patrols aim to reduce tensions with the YPG and Turkish troops, which continually skirmish.

Moscow, like Washington, has developed a good relationship with the YPG. The PYD, the political wing of the YPG, has offices in Moscow. Russia, unlike Turkey’s Western allies, has not designated the PKK a terrorist organization. Ankara voices little public criticism of Moscow’s PKK stance, while at the same time castigating its European and American allies for not cracking down enough on the PKK, even though they do categorize the militants as terrorists.

Turkey’s growing alienation from its traditional Western allies seems set to continue given Ankara’s deepening ties with Moscow, and analysts warn of inescapable historical diplomatic realities.

“Historically speaking, since Peter the Great [Russian 18th century leader), Turks and Russians never had any joint strategic objective, never, this is for 300 years,” Aktar said. “Also, it’s not possible now that they start to kiss each other and have joint strategic objectives; these countries will always be regional rivals. Unfortunately, Ankara thinks they can play Russian and Americans against each other; it won’t work.”

your ad here

UN Agency: Thousands Trapped in Yemen’s Northern Flashpoint

A U.N. humanitarian agency warned in a report Tuesday that thousands of Yemeni civilians caught in fierce clashes between warring factions are trapped in an embattled northern district.

The number of displaced in the district of Hajjah has doubled over the past six months, said the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA.

The impoverished governorate is home of Yemen’s most recent flashpoint district of Kusher where “thousands of civilians are reportedly trapped between conflicting parties,” it said.

“It is outrageous that innocent civilians continue to die needlessly in a conflict that should, and can be solved,” said Lise Grande, the U.N. humanitarian coordinator in Yemen.

Over the past two days, airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition, which is fighting on behalf of Yemen’s internationally recognized government, have killed 22 people, including women and 14 children in the area.

Yemen’s Houthi rebels imposed tight control over Kusher after powerful local tribesmen took up arms against them.

The district’s tribes, in a deal with the Houthis, had remained neutral in Yemen’s civil war, which erupted in 2014, and were in return left in peace on their lands. But after the Houthis tried to use the district to send weapons and reinforcements to a coastal area where they have been fighting Saudi-backed forces, the deal collapsed.

The Houthis subsequently shelled the district — home to 100,000 people — and killed and wounded scores of civilians. Thousands were displaced. As the Houthi siege strangled the area, the Saudi-led coalition airdropped food and medicine to the tribes.

Yemen’s civil war has killed over 60,000 people — both civilians and combatants — and displaced 3 million, pushing the already impoverished nation to the brink of famine.

your ad here

UN Agency: Thousands Trapped in Yemen’s Northern Flashpoint

A U.N. humanitarian agency warned in a report Tuesday that thousands of Yemeni civilians caught in fierce clashes between warring factions are trapped in an embattled northern district.

The number of displaced in the district of Hajjah has doubled over the past six months, said the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA.

The impoverished governorate is home of Yemen’s most recent flashpoint district of Kusher where “thousands of civilians are reportedly trapped between conflicting parties,” it said.

“It is outrageous that innocent civilians continue to die needlessly in a conflict that should, and can be solved,” said Lise Grande, the U.N. humanitarian coordinator in Yemen.

Over the past two days, airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition, which is fighting on behalf of Yemen’s internationally recognized government, have killed 22 people, including women and 14 children in the area.

Yemen’s Houthi rebels imposed tight control over Kusher after powerful local tribesmen took up arms against them.

The district’s tribes, in a deal with the Houthis, had remained neutral in Yemen’s civil war, which erupted in 2014, and were in return left in peace on their lands. But after the Houthis tried to use the district to send weapons and reinforcements to a coastal area where they have been fighting Saudi-backed forces, the deal collapsed.

The Houthis subsequently shelled the district — home to 100,000 people — and killed and wounded scores of civilians. Thousands were displaced. As the Houthi siege strangled the area, the Saudi-led coalition airdropped food and medicine to the tribes.

Yemen’s civil war has killed over 60,000 people — both civilians and combatants — and displaced 3 million, pushing the already impoverished nation to the brink of famine.

your ad here

Hero or Villain, Ocasio-Cortez Remains a Media Fixation

Believe it or not, there are other members of Congress besides Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

 

You wouldn’t know that by how the freshman Democrat from New York has become a media fixation like no other politician since President Donald Trump. She’s been a cover subject in both New York tabloids, a punchline on “Saturday Night Live,” the target of a Washington Post investigation and depicted as a hamburglar at a conservative conference — and that’s only this month so far.

 

This past weekend she was featured at the trendy South by Southwest conference, where science guy Bill Nye offered a surprise endorsement of her environmental plans.

 

Boldness, youth and an embrace of social media have made AOC — the shorthand is already widely known — a hero to the left, a villain to the right and irresistible to journalists.

 

“She is the political mirror image of Donald Trump,” said Frank Sesno, director of the School of Media and Public Affairs at George Washington University and a former CNN Washington bureau chief. “He’s old, she’s young. He’s far right, she’s far left. What they share is a take-no-prisoners, no-holds-barred approach to politics, and their rhetoric is the brash, sometimes profane rhetoric of our social-media-driven times.”

 

Moving into a presidential primary campaign where a defining issue will be how far left the Democrats want to move, AOC has become a symbol for the party’s progressive wing even though, at 29, she’s too young to run herself.

 

Her status is evident on social media. During the second half of February, the hashtag (at)AOC was mentioned 3.64 million times on Twitter. That was more than the hashtags for the two congressional leaders, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (1.22 million) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (696,000) combined.

 

Since she took office, stories about AOC have averaged about 2,200 likes, shares, or comments on Facebook, according to the social media analytics company NewsWhip. That’s more than double the typical interactions on Pelosi articles. No other Democrats came closer.

 

With such metrics, news stories are certain to follow. There have been many, ranging from the Washington Post’s look at whether questionable financial practices of Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional chief of staff clash with his boss’ view on money in politics, to a Daily Mail reporter tracking down her mother and discovering — surprise! — she’d like to see her daughter get married.

 

AOC frequently uses social media to counter stories. When a dance video she made with friends in college circulated, she combined video of a brief twirl outside her office with the message: “If Republicans thought women dancing in college is scandalous, wait `til they find out women dance in Congress, too.”

 

After the New York Post suggested AOC, chief proponent of “Green New Deal” legislation, might be hypocritical for riding in gas-guzzling cars, she noted that she also uses airplanes and air conditioners. “Living in the world as it is isn’t an argument against working toward a better future,” she tweeted.

 

“She understood how to use social media in a way that is incredibly effective, both to speak to constituents and other people in power with a truly authentic voice,” said veteran news executive Kate O’Brian.

 

AOC’s defeat of powerful Rep. Joseph Crowley in a primary led many young Democrats to embrace her as an underdog. That’s also perfect for Republicans who like to portray more extreme elements as typical of the Democratic party, Sesno said. The GOP is increasingly dominated by older, white men, and here’s an outspoken, young Latina woman from the heathen environs of New York City.

“This idea of making her the face of the Democratic party hits a lot of boxes for them,” said Nicole Hemmer, author of “Messengers of the Right” (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016), about the conservative media’s impact on politics. “She is young, a symbol of the party moving to the left, and she isn’t afraid of the word ‘socialism.'”

 

In January, Fox News Channel’s prime-time hosts Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham did 27 segments focusing on the freshman Democrat. There were none on McConnell, according to the liberal watchdog Media Matters.

 

“It’s not a mystery,” said Tim Graham of the conservative Media Research Center. “AOC is a machine of silly things she says, gaffes and extreme statements, and the impression she gives is amateurism. The same thing that is her appeal is also her downside. She was a bartender.”

 

Her opponents have also been guilty of overreach, such as when a quickly disproven photo was spread online purporting to be a nudie selfie. Conservative activist Sebastian Gorka claimed of AOC’s environmental legislation, “they want to take away your hamburgers.”

 

Ocasio-Cortez told The New Yorker magazine last week that the “ravenous hysteria” about her is getting out of control.

 

“It feels like an extra job,” she said. “I’ve got a full-time job in Congress and then I moonlight as America’s greatest villain, or as the new hope. And it’s pretty tiring. I’m just a normal person.”

 

There’s already a backlash; the Post’s Alexandra Petri wrote satirically last week, “I am sick of hearing about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from my voice talking about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.”

 

Greta Van Susteren, political analyst for the Gray Television stations, warned AOC to watch out.

 

“Being the media darling is fun while it lasts and it is power that can be wielded effectively,” Van Susteren said. “But of course the media can be like a bad date — fickle. You can get dropped fast, not even a ride home.”

 

Hemmer believes the young politician isn’t going anywhere soon.

 

“She’s definitely not a flash in the pan,” said the University of Virginia professor. “She definitely has some staying power, and it’s going to be interesting to see how she evolves over time.”

your ad here

Coast Guard Officer Accused of Making Hit List Pleads Not Guilty

A U.S. Coast Guard officer accused of plotting a domestic terror attack has pleaded not guilty to weapon and drug charges. 

Lieutenant Christopher Hasson on Monday appeared in U.S. District Court in Maryland and was sent back to jail ahead of his trial.

Hasson was arrested in February after police uncovered alleged plans to “murder innocent civilians on a scale rarely seen in this country,” according to the government’s court filing.

Officers found 15 guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition in his suburban Washington apartment. The government has not said what prompted its investigation of Hasson in the first place.

“I am dreaming of a way to kill almost every last person on the Earth,” Hasson allegedly wrote in a 2017 email. “I think a plague would be most successful, but how do I acquire the needed Spanish flu, botulism, anthrax, not sure yet, but will find something.”

Prosecutors said Hasson wanted to establish a “white homeland” and had a hit list of liberal politicians singled out for assassination. They included Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a number of Democratic presidential candidates. CNN and MSNBC television personalities were also on the list.

He was indicted on charges of unlawful possession of two improperly registered silencers, possession of a narcotic opioid and possession of 17 firearms as an unlawful user and addict of a controlled substance. If convicted on all counts, he could be sentenced to more than 30 years in prison.

Hasson’s public defender, Julie Stelzig, has accused prosecutors of not having the evidence to back up their accusations. She says people cannot be imprisoned simply for thinking “negative thoughts” about others.

your ad here

Pelosi: Impeaching Trump ‘Just Not Worth It’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is setting a high bar for impeachment of President Donald Trump, saying he is “just not worth it” even as some on her left flank clamor to start proceedings.

 

Pelosi said in an interview with The Washington Post that “I’m not for impeachment” of Trump.

 

“Unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country,” she said.

 

While she has made similar comments before, Pelosi is making clear to her caucus and to voters that Democrats will not move forward quickly with trying to remove Trump from office. And it’s a departure from her previous comments that Democrats are waiting on special counsel Robert Mueller to lay out findings from his Russia investigation before considering impeachment.

 

That thinking among Democrats has shifted, slightly, in part because of the possibility that Mueller’s report will not be decisive and because his investigation is more narrowly focused. Instead, House Democrats are pursuing their own broad, high-profile investigations that will keep the focus on Trump’s business dealings and relationship with Russia, exerting congressional oversight without having to broach the I-word.

 

Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, one of the lawmakers leading those investigations, said he agrees with Pelosi and Congress needs “to do our homework.” He said impeachment “has to be a bipartisan effort, and right now it’s not there.”

 

“I get the impression this matter will only be resolved at the polls,” Cummings said.

 

Still, Pelosi’s comments are certain to stoke a stubborn tension with those who believe impeachment proceedings should have begun on day one of the new Congress. Some new freshman Democrats who hail from solidly liberal districts haven’t shied away from the subject — Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib used a vulgarity in calling for Trump’s impeachment the day she was sworn in.

 

Billionaire activist Tom Steyer, who is bankrolling a campaign pushing for Trump’s impeachment, shot back at Pelosi on Monday: “Speaker Pelosi thinks ‘he’s just not worth it?’ Well, is defending our legal system ‘worth it?’ Is holding the president accountable for his crimes and cover-ups ‘worth it?’ Is doing what’s right ‘worth it?’ Or shall America just stop fighting for our principles and do what’s politically convenient.”

 

Neil Sroka of the liberal advocacy group Democracy for America said Pelosi’s comments were “a little like an oncologist taking chemotherapy off the table before she’s even got your test results back.”

 

Other lawmakers who have called for impeachment looked at Pelosi’s comments more practically. Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who filed articles of impeachment against Trump on the first day of the new Congress in January, acknowledged that there is not yet public support for impeachment, but noted that Pelosi “didn’t say ‘I am against it if the public is clamoring for it.'”

 

Sherman said that the multiple Democratic investigations of Trump might be a substitute for impeachment, “it’s also possible it will be a prelude.”

 

Republicans alternately praised Pelosi and were skeptical. White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said “I agree” in response to Pelosi’s words.

 

Sanders added of impeachment, “I don’t think it should have ever been on the table.”

 

House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy said it was a “smart thing for her to say,” but Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said he doesn’t think it’s “going to fly” with some of Pelosi’s members.

 

“I do believe what Speaker Pelosi understands is that what they’re wanting to do is going to require far more than what they have now, so I think they are hedging their bet on it,” Collins said.

 

Pelosi has long resisted calls to impeach the president, saying it’s a “divisive” issue that should only be broached with “great care.”

 

She refused calls when she first held the speaker’s gavel, in 2007, to start impeachment proceedings against George W. Bush. Having been a member of Congress during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment, she saw the way the public turned on Republicans and helped Clinton win a second term. Heading into the midterm elections, she discouraged candidates from talking up impeachment, preferring to stick to the kitchen table issues that she believes most resonate with voters.

 

Pelosi has often said the House should not pursue impeachment for political reasons, but it shouldn’t hold back for political reasons, either. Rather, she says, the investigations need to take their course and impeachment, if warranted, will be clear.

 

Freshman Democrats who are from more moderate districts and will have to win re-election again in two years have been fully supportive of Pelosi’s caution.

 

“When we have something that’s very concrete, and we have something that is compelling enough to get a strong majority of Americans, then we’ll do it,” said Rep. Katie Hill, D-Calif. “But if it’s going to be a political disaster for us, then we’re not going to do it.”

your ad here

Report: Iran Preparing for Role in Syria’s Reconstruction

Iranian construction companies are to build thousands of residential units in the suburbs of Syria’s capital, Damascus, an Iranian state-run news agency has reported.

Iranian Students News Agency (ISNA) recently quoted a business official with the country’s investment association, who announced that Iran would build 200,000 residential units near Damascus.

Iraj Rahbar, vice president of Iran’s Mass Construction Society, said the massive housing project has come about after the Iranian and Syrian governments signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in January 2019.

Tehran has been encouraging prominent Iranian developers to buy property in Damascus, analysts and construction industry sources in Iran said.

“This is not the first time that officials encourage developers to invest in Syria,” Amir Reza Masoumi, a Tehran-based architect, told VOA.

Masoumi, who has knowledge of ongoing discussions, said that instability in Syria has dissuaded many Iranian developers from investing in the war-torn country.

“Even now, details on how to protect the interests of Iranian investors in Syria are still unclear,” he said.

Since the beginning of Syria’s civil war in 2011, Iran has been a major supporter of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime in battling Syrian rebels across the country. Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a U.S.-designated terror group, and other Tehran-backed Shiite militias have played a major role in recapturing Syrian cities and towns from rebel forces.

Foothold in Syria

As the war is waning, Iran wants to keep a strong footing in Syria by urging Iranian construction companies to invest in the war-torn country.

“The projected location of these buildings is several parts of Damascus suburbs, where massive destruction has taken place,” a Syrian journalist, who requested anonymity because of fears from the Syrian regime, told VOA.

“The Syrian regime doesn’t make such things public,” he added. 

He said that he has witnessed some Iranian business groups exploring destroyed parts of Damascus, adding that Tehran has already been involved in several other housing projects in Homs and Latakia provinces.

Syrian regime troops, supported by allied Iranian forces and Russia, regained full control of eastern Damascus in 2018 after nearly five years of fighting with rebel groups.

Iranian officials say that more investments in countries like Syria would help ease some financial pressure on Iran from the international sanctions imposed on the government.

“This is a great way of increasing international turnover and benefiting from our capabilities in terms of construction overseas,” said Rahbar, of Iran’s Mass Construction Society.

Experts said Iranian companies would shift their focus to places like Syria since a large number of Iranian investors have been barred from working in the U.A.E. and other Gulf countries, due to inability to transfer money using international banks after recent U.S. sanctions on additional Iranian entities.

“There are quite many methods Iranians have learned to subvert sanctions,” Masoumi said. “But a big project like this needs a great banking support between both [Syrian and Iranian] governments.”

During several visits by Syrian officials to Tehran, including a recent one by Assad, large investments and increased financial cooperation between the two allies have been one of the major points of discussion, local news reports said.

The role of cleric

In Damascus, Iran has reportedly relied on a prominent Shiite cleric, Abdullah Nazzam, to arrange its real estate dealings. Using his religious authority in Damascus and ties with the Syrian government, he has persuaded residents to sell their properties to Iranian businessmen.

While Iran — a Shiite-majority country — continues to build itself as one of the major players in Syria’s future reconstruction, it also wants to carry out a systematic demographic change in many parts of Damascus and elsewhere in Syria, some experts charge.

“Iran is exploiting the fact that many Syrians, who are mostly Sunnis, have become extremely poor because of the war, and so it is offering them high prices for their properties that they can’t refuse,” said Musallam Talas, a professor of economics at Mardin Artuklu University in Turkey.

Talas told VOA the reason Iran is largely focusing on the housing sector in Syria is the fact that Iranian officials are well aware of how significant rebuilding that sector would be in the future.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) says the cost of reconstruction in Syria is almost $400 billion. Nearly 65 percent of that amount would go to the housing sector, according to IMF data.

your ad here