Israeli PM Vows to Bar Iran From Securing Presence in Syria

Israel’s prime minister vowed to prevent Iran from securing a lasting presence in Syria as he visited Moscow on Wednesday for talks focusing on regional security.

For Benjamin Netanyahu, it’s the first trip to Moscow since September’s downing of a Russian warplane by Syrian forces that were responding to an Israeli airstrike. The incident left 15 Russian crew dead and threatened to derail close security ties between Russia and Israel.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said at the start of Wednesday’s talks that “it’s very important to discuss the situation in the region and security issues.”

He added that the high-level consultations are essential in view of the evolving situation.

Netanyahu began the talks by reaffirming Israel’s strong determination to block attempts by Iran to establish a foothold in Syria.

“The greatest threat to stability and security in the region comes from Iran and its satellites,” he said. “We are determined to continue with our aggressive action against the efforts of Iran, which calls for our destruction, and against its attempts to entrench militarily in Syria.”

Moscow has played a delicate diplomatic game of maintaining friendly ties with both Israel and Iran. Last summer, Moscow struck a deal with Tehran to keep its fighters away from the Golan Heights to accommodate Israeli concerns about the Iranian presence in Syria.

Netanyahu noted that he and Putin had 11 meetings since September 2015 and hailed “the direct, open and true way in which we maintain the relationship between Russia and Israel.”

“The direct connection between us has been an essential element that has prevented risks and conflicts between our militaries, and that has contributed to regional security and stability,” the Israeli leader said.

Netanyahu congratulated Putin on the military holiday Russia marked last weekend and invited him to visit Israel to attend the opening of a monument to the Nazi siege of Leningrad during World War II.

“We will never forget the role of Russia and the Red Army in the victory over the Nazis,” he said.

Putin, a native of the city, accepted the offer.

Netanyahu praised “excellent bilateral relations,” noting “more than one million Russian speakers who have made a great contribution to Israel, have turned into a part of us, and have made Russian culture a part of Israeli culture.”

your ad here

Trump’s Ex-Lawyer to Tell House Panel President is a ‘Con Man’

​In what promises to be a riveting and historic televised hearing, Michael Cohen, U.S. President Donald Trump’s former longtime personal lawyer, is set to appear before a House oversight panel Wednesday to provide an intimate and potentially damaging look at Trump’s business empire, as well as his conduct during and after the 2016 presidential election campaign.

In prepared testimony obtained by news organizations ahead of the hearing, Cohen says of Trump: “He is a racist. He is a con man. He is a cheat.”

Cohen says Trump had knowledge of, directed, and lied about negotiations his company had during the 2016 presidential campaign to build a skyscraper in Moscow.

And Cohen says Trump knew that his campaign adviser Roger Stone was in contact with WikiLeaks head Julian Assange about the release of hacked Democratic National Committee emails before WikiLeaks released them to the public.

Cohen goes on to say Trump never expected to win the U.S. presidential election, instead viewing his candidacy as “a marketing opportunity.”

The prepared remarks detail reimbursements by Trump for hush money payments Cohen made to keep quiet two women, porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal, who claimed they had sexual relations with the billionaire real estate businessman. Cohen says Trump personally signed 11 checks from his personal bank account while he was president, and that he is providing the committee a copy of one of those checks.

And while Cohen says he does not have direct evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, he says “I have my suspicions.”

He cites as potential evidence a conversation he witnessed between Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr. Cohen says he believes the topic was a meeting that would take place at Trump tower involving Donald Trump Jr., the president’s son-in-law and now senior White House adviser Jared Kushner, his campaign manager Paul Manafort, and a Russian lawyer with ties to the Russian government.

That meeting has drawn scrutiny, including from special counsel Robert Mueller. Trump has denied having advance knowledge of the talks, and in August downplayed allegations that his side was there to get potentially harmful information about his presidential opponent Hillary Clinton, saying such acts are “totally legal and done all the time in politics.”

Hours before Wednesday’s testimony was due to begin, Trump wrote on Twitter seemingly trying to distance himself from Cohen.

“Michael Cohen was one of many lawyers who represented me (unfortunately),” the president wrote. “He did bad things unrelated to Trump. He is lying in order to reduce his prison time.”

Cohen will become the highest-profile witness since the 1970s Watergate scandal to testify in Congress against a sitting American president.

The last time the United States witnessed anything like this was in 1973, when former White House Counsel John Dean delivered a dramatic testimony that implicated President Richard Nixon and others in a cover-up effort in the Watergate affair. A year later Nixon became the first American president in history to resign.

Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress once before and will have his work cut out to persuade lawmakers he is telling the truth this time.

Facing a lengthy prison sentence, Cohen struck a deal with prosecutors.

In August, he pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including campaign finance violations in connection with the payments to Daniels and McDougal. In December, he pleaded guilty to one count of lying to Congress about the Trump Organization’s efforts to negotiate a deal to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow during the 2016 presidential campaign.

In return, he received a three-year prison sentence. He’s scheduled to report to prison in early May.

 

As part of his plea agreement, Cohen is continuing to cooperate with federal prosecutors in New York who are investigating Trump’s business interests and millions of dollars of donations made to his presidential inaugural committee. Cohen was a fundraiser for the committee.

 

Chris Hannas contributed to this report

 

your ad here

Trump, Kim Set for Meeting

U.S. President Donald Trump says his “friend,” North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, has “awesome” potential to grow his economy. That message came in a tweet just hours before Trump is set to meet Kim in Vietnam. But it’s not clear whether Trump’s personal outreach to Kim can bring results, as VOA’s Bill Gallo reports from Hanoi.

your ad here

Nadler: Former US AG Whitaker to Clarify House Testimony

Former acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker agreed to meet with lawmakers to clarify his testimony, a congressional leader said on Tuesday, referring to an appearance where Whitaker was quizzed about whether President Donald Trump had sought to influence investigations.

“I want to thank Mr. Whitaker for volunteering to meet with us to clarify his @HouseJudiciary testimony,” Representative Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, tweeted, saying he hoped to schedule Whitaker in the “coming days.”

Lawmakers have not said what Whitaker will address from his Feb. 8 testimony, which Nadler previously said was “unsatisfactory, incomplete, or contradicted by other evidence.”

But the most persistent questions then focused on whether Whitaker had contact with Trump about an investigation into hush-money payments to women during Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney.

The Justice Department, which has already said Whitaker stands by his testimony, had no immediate comment.

The brief tenure of Whitaker as head of the Justice Department ended on Feb. 14 when the Senate confirmed Trump’s choice of permanent Attorney General William Barr.

The Judiciary Committee has obtained possible evidence suggesting that Trump asked Whitaker about possibly changing the prosecutor in charge of the hush-money probe, said a person familiar with the matter.

A House Judiciary Committee spokesman and a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.

If true, such a request by Trump could bolster Democratic efforts to show that the president has sought to influence law enforcement investigations against him and his associates.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is said to be close to ending a 21-month investigation into whether Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help Trump; whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Moscow; and whether Trump has since obstructed justice.

Russia has denied meddling. Trump has denied any collusion.

The Mueller probe has clouded his presidency for many months.

Nadler’s panel has information suggesting that Trump asked Whitaker if U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman could take control of an investigation of Cohen by prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, said the source who asked not to be identified.

Berman is a former law partner of another Trump attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Trump dismissed as false a report in the New York Times last week about a similar request to Whitaker.

Congressional investigators now have information that such a request was made and that Whitaker provided misleading testimony to the panel while under oath during his contentious Feb. 8 hearing, the source said.

In that session, Whitaker testified he had not talked to Trump about the probe and had not interfered with it in any way.

He also denied media reports that claimed that Trump had lashed out at Whitaker after he learned Cohen was pleading guilty to lying to Congress about a proposed Trump Tower in Moscow.

Nadler said then that media reports contradicted Whitaker’s testimony and that “several individuals” had direct knowledge of phone calls Whitaker denied receiving from the White House.

Cohen was sentenced in December to three years in prison after pleading guilty to campaign finance violations, including making payments to adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels, and former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

Cohen said he made those payments at the direction of Trump.

Both women have claimed they had affairs with Trump. He has denied having sex with Daniels and denied McDougal’s claim.

Cohen testified behind closed doors to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday. He is expected to testify publicly on Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee.

your ad here

Russia’s Ex-Cybersecurity Chief Gets 22-year Sentence in Jail

A Russian military court convicted a former senior counterintelligence officer and a cybersecurity firm executive of treason Tuesday, concluding a case that initially aroused speculation of a manufactured effort to punish the source of leaks about Russian campaign hacking.

 

Moscow’s District Military Court heard several months of evidence and arguments behind closed doors before it found Col. Sergei Mikhailov, an ex-officer at Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), and Kaspersky Lab executive Ruslan Stoyanov guilty.

 

The basis for the charges remains murky given the top-secret nature of the criminal proceedings. Russian media have reported the case centers on accusations that Mikhailov contacted Stoyanov to pass information from an FSB probe of a Russian businessmen Pavel Vrublevsky to an analyst with alleged ties to the FBI.

 

Mikhailov, the deputy head of cyber intelligence at the domestic security agency, also known as FSB, received a 22-year prison sentence and was stripped of his military rank and decorations, which included the elite “For Services to the Fatherland.”

 

The court gave Stoyanov 14 years. The two men listened to the verdicts and sentences from a glass cage inside the courtroom, flanked by masked men.

 

After the pair were arrested and charged in December 2016, the timing led some people to suggest the actions were linked to the 2016 U.S. presidential election and a possible mole who tipped off U.S. intelligence agencies about Russian interference.

 

Later news reports said Mikhailov was prosecuted for passing on details about an unrelated case to an American cybercrime analyst.

 

Andrei Soldatov, an expert on the Russian security services and co-author of “Red Web” told The Associated Press on Tuesday he still thinks the criminal case against Mikhailov and Stoyanov was a direct response to U.S. officials investigating election-related hacking.

 

“Their arrest… was a direct follow-up to the outcry in the U.S. over the Russian meddling,” Soldatov said. “Mikhailov was the top FSB officer in charge of maintaining contacts with Western security agencies in the cyber-sphere, something that went out of fashion after the last scandal.”

 

Inga Lebedeva, Stoyanov’s defense lawyer, said secrecy rules prevented her from providing details about the trial. But Lebedeva said after the verdicts were given that allegations involving potential meddling in the U.S. elections did not come up.

 

She alleged the charges were trumped up to appease the Russian businessman Mikhailov was accused of passing on information about, Pavel Vrublevsky.

 

“The case has been concocted at Vrublevsky’s orders” Lebedeva alleged.

 

Vrublevsky, who testified during the long trial, rejected her accusation. It was not the content of the information Mikhailov allegedly passed on to the American analyst that constituted treason, but that he shared information about an active FSB investigation with a foreign citizen.

 

The businessman alleged Mikhailov abused his position at the FSB to go after internet entrepreneurs like him and “turn them into cybercriminals,” thus “whipping up cyber-hysteria around the world.”

your ad here

Sudan Establishes Emergency Courts, Reshuffles Senior Military Staff

Sudan has established emergency prosecutors and courts nationwide, state news agency SUNA said Tuesday, a day after President Omar al-Bashir announced sweeping new security powers to contend with months of unrest.

Bashir declared a national state of emergency last Friday and sacked state governors, replacing them with officials from the military and security services.

Dozens of doctors staged peaceful protests in the capital Khartoum and other cities Tuesday, chanting slogans in the halls of several public hospitals and demanding that Bashir step down. Hundreds of students also continued protests at Sudan’s oldest university for women, in the city of Omdurman.

Neighboring Egypt and some Western countries including the United States expressed concern about the situation in Sudan, which has been shaken by almost daily demonstrations since December over the rising cost of living and other grievances.

As well as having emergency courts set up in every Sudanese state, Bashir also reshuffled some senior military staff on Tuesday. He switched the positions of several members of Sudan’s eight-strong military staff council and appointed General Essam al-Din Mubarak as minister of state in the defense ministry.

“These are normal, routine changes that happen from time to time,” a military spokesman told Reuters.

A coalition of opposition lawyers denounced Tuesday’s moves as unconstitutional.

‘Deep concern’

Bashir, who came to power in 1989 in a military coup, issued a raft of edicts Monday banning unlicensed public gatherings and awarding sweeping new powers to police.

Security forces were given the power to search any building, restrict movement of people and public transport, arrest individuals suspected of a crime related to the state of emergency, and seize assets or property during investigations.

The United States, Britain, Norway and Canada issued a joint statement expressing “deep concern” over the situation.

“There remains a clear need for political and economic reform in Sudan that is fully inclusive, and which addresses the legitimate grievances expressed by the protesters,” it said.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, speaking to Reuters on Tuesday on the sidelines of a U.N. Human Rights Council conference in Geneva, said Egypt stood ready to help its southern neighbour if required.

“We believe that the Sudanese and Egyptian peoples have a common history and a common future, and definitely anything that disrupts the security, stability and prosperity of the Sudanese people is of utmost concern to us,” Shoukry said.

your ad here

Iraq PM Says Country Could Take Non-Iraqi IS Detainees From Syria

Iraq could help transfer non-Iraqi Islamic State detainees held by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Syria, Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi said on Tuesday.

Iraq will either help repatriate those citizens to their home countries, or prosecute on its own those suspected of having committed crimes, he said at his weekly news conference.

“Some countries could ask Iraq to help to transfer some of her Daesh citizens to the other country, like France for example,” Abdul Mahdi said, using the Arabic acronym for Islamic State. “Iraq might help, would help, helped to transfer those people to their country. It is one battle and Iraq should fulfill its duties and obligations.”

“Fighters belonging to Daesh from other countries that their states, their countries refuse to receive — how should we deal with that?” he asked.

“Each case we should study the names, whether they participated in terrorist acts in Iraq. Then they could be judged by Iraqi tribunals.”

Earlier in the press conference, the prime minister specified that Iraq would not receive from Syria foreign fighters whose home countries refused to take back from Iraq.

The comments came one day after Iraqi President Barham Salih said that 13 Islamic State detainees who were transferred to Iraq last week from the Syrian Democratic Forces would be tried in Iraq.

Two Iraqi military sources told Reuters on Sunday that the U.S.-backed SDF handed over 14 French and six non-Iraqi Arab Islamic detainees last week.

The fate of foreign detainees in SDF custody has become more pressing in recent weeks as U.S.-backed fighters planned an assault to capture the last remnants of the group’s self-styled caliphate.

The militant group still poses a threat in Iraq and some western officials believe that Islamic State’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, may still be hiding in the area.

“We will deal with the case because if we don’t, then they can use a 600 km (372.82 miles) border with Syria and infiltrate once again in Iraq. So it’s a case that really concerns us, worries us and we have to deal with it,” Abdul Mahdi said.

your ad here

Iraq PM Says Country Could Take Non-Iraqi IS Detainees From Syria

Iraq could help transfer non-Iraqi Islamic State detainees held by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in Syria, Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi said on Tuesday.

Iraq will either help repatriate those citizens to their home countries, or prosecute on its own those suspected of having committed crimes, he said at his weekly news conference.

“Some countries could ask Iraq to help to transfer some of her Daesh citizens to the other country, like France for example,” Abdul Mahdi said, using the Arabic acronym for Islamic State. “Iraq might help, would help, helped to transfer those people to their country. It is one battle and Iraq should fulfill its duties and obligations.”

“Fighters belonging to Daesh from other countries that their states, their countries refuse to receive — how should we deal with that?” he asked.

“Each case we should study the names, whether they participated in terrorist acts in Iraq. Then they could be judged by Iraqi tribunals.”

Earlier in the press conference, the prime minister specified that Iraq would not receive from Syria foreign fighters whose home countries refused to take back from Iraq.

The comments came one day after Iraqi President Barham Salih said that 13 Islamic State detainees who were transferred to Iraq last week from the Syrian Democratic Forces would be tried in Iraq.

Two Iraqi military sources told Reuters on Sunday that the U.S.-backed SDF handed over 14 French and six non-Iraqi Arab Islamic detainees last week.

The fate of foreign detainees in SDF custody has become more pressing in recent weeks as U.S.-backed fighters planned an assault to capture the last remnants of the group’s self-styled caliphate.

The militant group still poses a threat in Iraq and some western officials believe that Islamic State’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, may still be hiding in the area.

“We will deal with the case because if we don’t, then they can use a 600 km (372.82 miles) border with Syria and infiltrate once again in Iraq. So it’s a case that really concerns us, worries us and we have to deal with it,” Abdul Mahdi said.

your ad here

Cameroon Cracks Down on Illegal Fuel Trade

Cameroonian police officers, assisted by members of the country’s elite corps, seized hundreds of containers of fuel illegally transported from Nigeria by suspected Central African Republic rebels in the northern town of Mbe, Cameroon.

Rigobert Ojong, a member of a task force of military, police and civil society members created three weeks ago to stop the illegal fuel trade, said the group received a tip that the fuel was on its way to the C.A.R., where it would be used by rebels fighting the central African state’s government. 

“We have put aside personnel dedicated to this fight, within the framework of this task force, and we have been able to intercept about 1,500 drums of fraudulently imported fuel. If we go by the price in the black market, we are talking about more than 3 billion CFA francs [$5 million] a year,” Ojong said.

Cameroon’s government says an unknown quantity of oil is smuggled from Nigeria through its territory because the border is so porous. The military says it has opened an investigation to track dealers who might be collaborating with rebel groups in the C.A.R.

Alleged corruption

Businessman Patrice Essola, who supplies fuel to the C.A.R. from Cameroon, says illegal trade with C.A.R. rebels is facilitated by corrupt government officials in both countries.

He said the rebels and traffickers work in collaboration with corrupt Cameroonian military officials and C.A.R. border immigration staff to import the fuel from Nigeria. Some of the tankers and trucks that smuggle the fuel are even protected by corrupt officials while in Cameroon and in the C.A.R., Essola added.

Kildadi Taguieke Boukar, governor of the Adamawa region that shares a border with the C.A.R., denies corrupt military officials assist rebels and smugglers, but said investigations had been opened.

Each time the traffickers are arrested, they answer charges in courts of law, Boukar said, but added the task is very, very difficult because Cameroon’s borders with Nigeria and the C.A.R. are very porous. All of the fuel will be taken to C.A.R. authorities, he said.

C.A.R. violence, peace deal

In January, Cameroon said 300 of its citizens had been abducted by suspected C.A.R. rebels within the past two years, along with at least 5,000 cattle. Local border communities asked the government to authorize self-defense groups to be equipped with guns to face rebels who they said continued to cross to their villages for supplies.

The C.A.R. was plunged into turmoil in 2013 when Muslim rebels known as the Seleka seized power in the majority-Christian country. A band of mostly Christian militias, called the anti-Balaka, rose up to counter the Seleka. Thousands of people have been killed in the violence and more than one million are internally displaced. An estimated 570,000 people have fled to neighboring countries, with about 350,000 in Cameroon.

On Feb. 2, the U.N. mission in the C.A.R., known as MINUSCA, and the African Union announced that a peace deal between the C.A.R. government and 14 rebel groups had been reached after sponsored talks in Sudan. They called on the C.A.R.’s neighbors to help bring peace by not allowing their borders to be used for supplies or as a hiding ground for fighters who refuse to respect the deal.

your ad here

Nigeria’s Buhari Wins Second Term as President

Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday won a second term at the helm of Africa’s largest economy and top oil producer, a tally by Reuters based on electoral commission results showed.

Buhari faces a daunting to-do list, including reviving an economy still struggling to recover from a 2016 recession and quelling a decade-old Islamist insurgency that has killed thousands of people in the northeast, many of them civilians.

Buhari of the All Progressive Congress party proved wrong those who doubted he could survive the blows of recession, militant attacks on oilfields, and Islamist insurgency that blighted his first term.

He won by 56 percent compared with 41 percent for the other candidate, businessman and former vice president Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party.

The president won by 3.9 million votes, having garnered 15.2 million to Atiku’s 11.3 million.

The turnout, based on valid votes, was 33.2 percent. In the 2015 presidential election, turnout was 44 percent.

A message posted on Buhari’s Twitter feed late on Tuesday showed him smiling and surrounded by applauding staff at his campaign office.

“I met the very hardworking members of our team, many of them young people, and was briefed on the performance of our party so far in the Presidential Elections. I am very proud of what has been accomplished,” he said on Twitter.

Garba Shehu, Buhari’s spokesman, said the president’s office would have no comment until the electoral commission announces the winner.

Earlier, Atiku’s party demanded an immediate halt to the release of results by the Independent National Electoral Commission until turnout figures are provided to the competing parties.

Atiku’s party has rejected the tallies announced so far as “incorrect and unacceptable”. Buhari’s party has said the opposition was trying to discredit the returns from Saturday’s election.

The accusations have ratcheted up tensions in a vote marred by delays, logistical glitches and outbreaks of violence.

Nigeria’s six decades of independence have been marked by long periods of military rule, coups and secessionist wars.

Observers from the Economic Community of West African States, the African Union and the United Nations appealed to all parties to await the official results, expected later this week, before filing complaints.

The candidate with the most votes nationwide is declared winner as long as they have at least one-quarter of the vote in two-thirds of Nigeria’s 36 states and the capital, Abuja.

Otherwise there is a second-round run-off.

Buhari secured enough votes to meet both requirements.

Ex-Military Ruler

Buhari, 76, is a former military ruler who took office in 2015 and sought a second term with pledges to fight corruption and overhaul Nigeria’s creaking road and rail network.

Atiku, 72, had said he would aim to double the size of the economy to $900 billion by 2025, privatize the state oil company and expand the role of the private sector if voted into office.

Voting took place on Saturday after a week-long delay which the election commission said was due to its inability to get ballots and results sheets to all parts of the country.

The event – Africa’s largest democratic exercise – has also been marred by violence in which at least 47 people have been killed since Saturday, according to the Situation Room, a monitoring organization linking various civil society groups.

Some of the deaths took place after gangs allied to the leading parties clashed with each other as well as the police over the theft of ballot boxes and allegations of vote fraud.

Police have not yet provided official casualty figures.

More than 260 people have been killed since the start of the election campaign in October. The toll so far is lower than in earlier elections, but the worst violence occurred previously only after results were announced.

your ad here

Mobile World Congress Overshadowed by Huawei 5G Spying Standoff

Robots, cars, drones and virtual-reality gaming sets connected by cutting-edge 5G networks are among the thousands of futuristic gadgets on display at this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain.

While there is much excitement over how 5G will transform our everyday lives, the conference is overshadowed by the standoff between the United States and Beijing over the Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, which the U.S. says could be used by the Chinese government for espionage.

Some U.S. cities and parts of Asia are already operating 5G mobile networks. They offer speeds of over a gigabyte per second and low latency — in other words, practically instant connections with no delay.

Experts say that opens up whole new fields of connectivity, from new generations of virtual reality gaming and communication, to remote robotic surgery.

The technology promises to transform not only the mobile phone in your pocket — but also the world around us, says Paul Triolo of the Eurasia Group, who spoke to VOA from the conference.

“The really key aspects of 5G, like some of the low latency communications and massive sensor, massive machine-to-machine communications, that’s more about industry and industrial uses. And that gets into thing like critical infrastructure so you’re going to have a lot more non-personal or industrial data flying around and that really has people concerned. For example, military forces in countries like the U.S. will also leverage large parts of the commercial network,” said Triolo.Chinese firm Huawei is a big presence at the Mobile World Congress and a big player in 5G network technology.

Washington has banned the company from 5G rollout in the United States, citing Chinese legislation requiring companies to cooperate with the state — raising fears Huawei 5G networks overseas could be used as a ‘Trojan horse’ to spy on rivals.

Attending the Mobile World Congress Tuesday, the U.S. State Department’s Deputy Secretary for Cyber Policy Robert L. Strayer urged allies to do the same.

“We will continue to engage with these governments and the regulators in these countries to educate them about what we know and keep sharing the best practices for how we can all successfully move to next generation of technology. I´ll just say there are plenty of options in the West,” Strayer told reporters.

Huawei’s management has said the company would never use ‘back doors’ for espionage — and the Chinese government has dismissed the accusations.

Australia, New Zealand and Japan have followed Washington’s lead and restricted Huawei’s involvement in 5G. Europe remains undecided — but the industry needs clarity, said analyst Paul Triolo.

“The European community in particular and also the U.S. have to clarify what these policies mean, what a ban would mean or what some kind of a partial ban would mean, if there’s really a middle ground that can be found here.”

Vodafone’s CEO Nick Read told the Barcelona conference that banning Huawei could set Europe’s 5G rollout back another two years.

The eye-catching gadgets show the potential that 5G networks are about to unleash. But the question of who controls those networks, and the data they carry, looms large over this futuristic world.

your ad here

US Judge Delays Admitted Russian Agent Butina’s Sentencing

A federal judge on Tuesday agreed to delay sentencing for Maria Butina, who has admitted to working to infiltrate a gun rights group and make inroads with U.S. conservative activists and Republicans as an agent for Russia, after a prosecutor said her cooperation was continuing.

Butina, 30, has been in custody since her arrest in July.

She pleaded guilty in December to one count of conspiring to act as a foreign agent of Russia. Butina’s attorney Robert Driscoll told U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in court on Tuesday his client is ready to be sentenced.

“From our perspective, we’re ready to go,” Driscoll said.

But the lead prosecutor in the case said the prosecution stills need Butina’s cooperation in its ongoing probe.

The judge said she is sensitive to the defense’s concerns, but agreed to postpone sentencing and hold another status conference next month.

“Ms. Butina has been detained for a substantial portion of what she would likely face,” Chutkan said. But, the judge added that “her cooperation continues to be needed by the government.”

The next status hearing is now scheduled for March 28.

your ad here

8 Facts: Yemenis ‘Dying Every Day’ as UN Makes Record Appeal

Donor pledges of $2.6 billion for Yemen fell “a long way” short of $4.2 billion requested by the United Nations on Tuesday for the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, aid agencies said.

Aid agencies, including Save the Children and Oxfam, called for a ceasefire to help them reach more people in need in Yemen, where a proxy-war between Saudi Arabia and Iran has displaced millions and pushed them to the verge of starvation.

“Yemeni people … are dying every single day this war continues,” the charities said in a joint statement.

Here are eight facts about the war in Yemen:

1 – Some 24 million people in Yemen — almost 80 percent of the population — are likely to need humanitarian assistance in 2019.

2 – Tuesday’s $4.2 billion pledging conference was the largest country appeal that the United Nations has ever launched.

3 – More than half of the funding for the U.N. appeal is for emergency food aid for 12 million people — a 50 per cent increase compared to last year.

4 – Almost 4.3 million people — or 15 percent of the population — have been forced to flee their homes since Yemen’s civil war began in 2015, the majority remaining inside the country.

5 –  More than 685,000 people have fled fighting along the west coast of Yemen since June.

6 – About 20 million people do not have enough to eat and almost half of these are “a step away from famine.” the U.N.’s humanitarian chief Mark Lowcock said this month.

7 – Some 20 million people in Yemen lack access to adequate healthcare, and nearly 18 million do not have enough clean water or adequate sanitation.

8 –  The United Nations has independently verified that more than 7,000 civilians have been killed and 11,000 injured in Yemen since 2015, although this is an underestimate as it cannot access some places and other casualties are not reported.

Sources: International Organization for Migration, CARE International, Save the Children International, Oxfam, Norwegian Refugee Council, UN-OCHA, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

your ad here

8 Facts: Yemenis ‘Dying Every Day’ as UN Makes Record Appeal

Donor pledges of $2.6 billion for Yemen fell “a long way” short of $4.2 billion requested by the United Nations on Tuesday for the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, aid agencies said.

Aid agencies, including Save the Children and Oxfam, called for a ceasefire to help them reach more people in need in Yemen, where a proxy-war between Saudi Arabia and Iran has displaced millions and pushed them to the verge of starvation.

“Yemeni people … are dying every single day this war continues,” the charities said in a joint statement.

Here are eight facts about the war in Yemen:

1 – Some 24 million people in Yemen — almost 80 percent of the population — are likely to need humanitarian assistance in 2019.

2 – Tuesday’s $4.2 billion pledging conference was the largest country appeal that the United Nations has ever launched.

3 – More than half of the funding for the U.N. appeal is for emergency food aid for 12 million people — a 50 per cent increase compared to last year.

4 – Almost 4.3 million people — or 15 percent of the population — have been forced to flee their homes since Yemen’s civil war began in 2015, the majority remaining inside the country.

5 –  More than 685,000 people have fled fighting along the west coast of Yemen since June.

6 – About 20 million people do not have enough to eat and almost half of these are “a step away from famine.” the U.N.’s humanitarian chief Mark Lowcock said this month.

7 – Some 20 million people in Yemen lack access to adequate healthcare, and nearly 18 million do not have enough clean water or adequate sanitation.

8 –  The United Nations has independently verified that more than 7,000 civilians have been killed and 11,000 injured in Yemen since 2015, although this is an underestimate as it cannot access some places and other casualties are not reported.

Sources: International Organization for Migration, CARE International, Save the Children International, Oxfam, Norwegian Refugee Council, UN-OCHA, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

your ad here

Iran’s Rouhani Stands by Moderate Ally Zarif After Surprise Resignation

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani held back from accepting the resignation of his foreign minister on Tuesday, standing by a moderate ally long targeted by hardliners in internal factional struggles over a 2015 nuclear deal with the West.

The minister, Mohammed Javad Zarif – a U.S.-educated veteran diplomat who helped craft the pact that curbed Iran’s nuclear program in return for sanctions relief – gave no reason for his decision to quit when he announced it on Instagram on Monday.

But his move thrust the schism between Iran’s hardliners and moderates into the open, effectively challenging Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to pick a side.

An ally of Zarif said his resignation was motivated by criticism of the nuclear accord, under increasingly intense fire in Iran since the United States abandoned it last year.

“There were closed-door meetings every week, where top officials were bombarding him with questions about the deal and what will happen next and so on,” a Zarif ally told Reuters on condition of anonymity. “He and his boss (Rouhani) were under a huge amount of pressure.”

Since the United States walked out of the nuclear deal and reimposed sanctions last year, Rouhani has had to explain why Iran has continued to abide by its restrictions while reaping virtually none of the foreseen economic benefits.

Despite announcing his resignation, Zarif had not officially tendered it to Rouhani by Tuesday afternoon and the president had not accepted it.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry reiterated that Rouhani had not accepted Zarif’s resignation, rejecting reports in the media.

In an apparently related development, an oil ministry spokesman said Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh is not resigning, according to the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA). Like Zarif, Zanganeh is regarded as a moderate.

“Wise and effective positions”

“All interpretations and analysis around the reasons behind the resignation of Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, beyond what he posted on his Instagram account, are not accurate and, as the chief of staff of the president of Iran said today, the resignation has not been accepted,” spokesman Bahram Qasemi was quoted as saying by Fars news.

Lawmakers representing the majority moderate faction sent Rouhani a letter asking him to keep Zarif on, IRNA reported.

Rouhani’s chief of staff Mahmoud Vaezi said Rouhani stood by Zarif. The president’s praise was “a clear sign of the satisfaction of the representative of the people of Iran about the wise and effective positions and work of Dr Zarif,” Vaezi wrote on Instagram.

Lawmaker Ali Motahari, like other politicians from both camps, said Rouhani was unlikely to accept Zarif’s decision since no one else could fill the demanding post.

The schism between hardliners and moderates over the nuclear deal shows the tension in Iran between the two factions, and between the elected government which runs the country on a day-to-day basis and a clerical establishment with ultimate power.

Rouhani won elections in 2013 and 2017 on reform promises, while Khamenei, in power since 1989, is seen as above factional infighting but sympathetic to hardliners. While Rouhani chooses ministers, Khamenei traditionally has the last say.

Uncertainty

“If he (Khamenei) publicly backs Zarif and Rouhani, this crisis will be over in a good way and it will narrow the gap between different political camps in the country,” said an official close to the hardline camp.

The political uncertainty comes at a difficult time for Iran’s leaders as the reimposed U.S. sanctions have dashed hopes of an economic breakthrough. Rouhani has warned that the country is facing the worst economic crisis in 40 years.

Hardships have triggered waves of nation-wide protests, with calls for both Rouhani and clerical leaders to step down.

Some unconfirmed Iranian media reports indicated Zarif had resigned because he had not been informed about a visit by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday.

Zarif was quoted as condemning “factional fighting” in a newspaper interview published on Tuesday – suggesting political tensions may have played a part in his decision. The Fars news agency reported that the interview had taken place last week, before Zarif’s resignation.

Slideshow (3 Images)

A former pro-reform official warned of dire consequences of Zarif’s resignation is accepted.

“If accepted, it will have a domino effect … and others (ministers) and even Rouhani might follow him and this is not something that the country can tolerate when pressured by America and sanctions,” he said.

“Hardliners will be strengthened and any kind of reform will be buried for at least 10 years.”

 

your ad here

Iran’s Rouhani Stands by Moderate Ally Zarif After Surprise Resignation

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani held back from accepting the resignation of his foreign minister on Tuesday, standing by a moderate ally long targeted by hardliners in internal factional struggles over a 2015 nuclear deal with the West.

The minister, Mohammed Javad Zarif – a U.S.-educated veteran diplomat who helped craft the pact that curbed Iran’s nuclear program in return for sanctions relief – gave no reason for his decision to quit when he announced it on Instagram on Monday.

But his move thrust the schism between Iran’s hardliners and moderates into the open, effectively challenging Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to pick a side.

An ally of Zarif said his resignation was motivated by criticism of the nuclear accord, under increasingly intense fire in Iran since the United States abandoned it last year.

“There were closed-door meetings every week, where top officials were bombarding him with questions about the deal and what will happen next and so on,” a Zarif ally told Reuters on condition of anonymity. “He and his boss (Rouhani) were under a huge amount of pressure.”

Since the United States walked out of the nuclear deal and reimposed sanctions last year, Rouhani has had to explain why Iran has continued to abide by its restrictions while reaping virtually none of the foreseen economic benefits.

Despite announcing his resignation, Zarif had not officially tendered it to Rouhani by Tuesday afternoon and the president had not accepted it.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry reiterated that Rouhani had not accepted Zarif’s resignation, rejecting reports in the media.

In an apparently related development, an oil ministry spokesman said Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh is not resigning, according to the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA). Like Zarif, Zanganeh is regarded as a moderate.

“Wise and effective positions”

“All interpretations and analysis around the reasons behind the resignation of Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, beyond what he posted on his Instagram account, are not accurate and, as the chief of staff of the president of Iran said today, the resignation has not been accepted,” spokesman Bahram Qasemi was quoted as saying by Fars news.

Lawmakers representing the majority moderate faction sent Rouhani a letter asking him to keep Zarif on, IRNA reported.

Rouhani’s chief of staff Mahmoud Vaezi said Rouhani stood by Zarif. The president’s praise was “a clear sign of the satisfaction of the representative of the people of Iran about the wise and effective positions and work of Dr Zarif,” Vaezi wrote on Instagram.

Lawmaker Ali Motahari, like other politicians from both camps, said Rouhani was unlikely to accept Zarif’s decision since no one else could fill the demanding post.

The schism between hardliners and moderates over the nuclear deal shows the tension in Iran between the two factions, and between the elected government which runs the country on a day-to-day basis and a clerical establishment with ultimate power.

Rouhani won elections in 2013 and 2017 on reform promises, while Khamenei, in power since 1989, is seen as above factional infighting but sympathetic to hardliners. While Rouhani chooses ministers, Khamenei traditionally has the last say.

Uncertainty

“If he (Khamenei) publicly backs Zarif and Rouhani, this crisis will be over in a good way and it will narrow the gap between different political camps in the country,” said an official close to the hardline camp.

The political uncertainty comes at a difficult time for Iran’s leaders as the reimposed U.S. sanctions have dashed hopes of an economic breakthrough. Rouhani has warned that the country is facing the worst economic crisis in 40 years.

Hardships have triggered waves of nation-wide protests, with calls for both Rouhani and clerical leaders to step down.

Some unconfirmed Iranian media reports indicated Zarif had resigned because he had not been informed about a visit by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday.

Zarif was quoted as condemning “factional fighting” in a newspaper interview published on Tuesday – suggesting political tensions may have played a part in his decision. The Fars news agency reported that the interview had taken place last week, before Zarif’s resignation.

Slideshow (3 Images)

A former pro-reform official warned of dire consequences of Zarif’s resignation is accepted.

“If accepted, it will have a domino effect … and others (ministers) and even Rouhani might follow him and this is not something that the country can tolerate when pressured by America and sanctions,” he said.

“Hardliners will be strengthened and any kind of reform will be buried for at least 10 years.”

 

your ad here

Ex-Lawyer Cohen’s Testimony in Congress Poses High Risks for Trump

In what promises to be a riveting and historic televised hearing, Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former long-time personal lawyer, is set to appear before a House oversight panel Wednesday to provide an intimate look at the Trump business empire. Cohen will become the highest-profile witness since the 1970s Watergate scandal to testify in Congress against a sitting American president.

 

Cohen’s tell-all public testimony providing potentially damaging evidence about Trump’s political and business activities both before and after his 2016 presidential victory will come while the president is in Hanoi for his second summit with Kim Jong Un to try to persuade the North Korean leader to dismantle his country’s nuclear weapons program.

 

The last time the U.S. witnessed anything like this was in 1973 when John Dean, the former White House Counsel, delivered a dramatic testimony that implicated President Richard Nixon and others in a cover-up effort in the Watergate affair.  A year later Nixon became the first American president in history to resign.

The disgraced attorney pleaded guilty to lying to Congress once before and will have his work cut out to persuade lawmakers he is telling the truth this time. In all, Cohen will appear before three committees this week, including two behind closed doors.  

Trump’s business interest, inauguration committee

 

While not a White House insider with the power to bring down a president, Cohen, 52, was intimately involved with Trump’s business interests, 2016 campaign, and inauguration committee — an intersection of activities under investigation by federal prosecutors in New York. Some of Trump’s allies, such as former senior White House strategist Stephen Bannon, view these probes as posing a greater threat to Trump’s presidency than the special counsel’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and possible collusion by Trump and his aides.

As executive vice president for the Trump Organization and personal lawyer to Trump for nearly 10 years, up until a couple of months after the election, Cohen made deals and put out fires for his celebrity tycoon boss.  

In his most direct intervention in the election, Cohen arranged and delivered hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal after the two women threatened to go public with their stories of alleged sexual affairs with Trump.  Cohen later testified that Trump directed him to pay off the women. Trump has denied the allegations.  

 

So loyal was he to Trump that he once said he would take a bullet for the celebrity businessman. But the relationship deteriorated last April after the FBI raided Cohen’s office, home and hotel room to seize documents related to the Daniels hush money and other alleged crimes and Trump distanced himself from his beleaguered attorney. By July, Cohen’s lawyer, Lanny Davis, was saying publicly that Cohen had decided to “hit a reset button” in his relationship with Trump and resented being a “punching bag” for the president.   

Cohen faced lengthy prison sentence

Facing a lengthy prison sentence, Cohen then struck a deal with prosecutors.  In August, he pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including campaign finance violations in connection with the payments to Daniels and McDougal.  In December, he pleaded guilty to one count of lying to Congress about the Trump Organization’s efforts to negotiate a deal to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow during the 2016 presidential campaign. In return, he received a three-year prison sentence. He’s scheduled to report to prison in early May.

 

As part of his plea agreement, Cohen is continuing to cooperate with federal prosecutors in New York who are investigating Trump’s business interests and millions of dollars of donations made to his presidential inaugural committee. Cohen was a fundraiser for the committee.  

 

However, as a convicted perjurer, Cohen must convince many of the same lawmakers he lied to that he is telling the truth this time.  

 

Cohen’s testimony before the House Oversight and Reform Committee is one of three appearances he makes before lawmakers this week.  He is also scheduled to testify before the Senate and House intelligence Committees on Tuesday and Thursday respectively. But those hearings will be held behind closed doors.   

Lawmakers will ask about hush money payments

 

Last week, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the Democratic chairman of the House oversight panel, told committee members that Cohen will not be asked about Russian interference in the 2016 election and alleged collusion between Trump campaign associates and Moscow. That questioning will be left to the intelligence committees, which are following the trail of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s two-year probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

 

Instead, the oversight committee hearing will focus on hush money payments made on behalf of Trump, Trump’s business practices as well as his compliance with campaign finance laws, tax laws, financial disclosure requirements and conflict of interest laws governing Trump’s government and private business practices, Cummings wrote in a memo to committee members. Other potential lines of questioning include the accuracy of Trump’s public statements, allegations of fraud by the now-defunct Trump Foundation, and “efforts by the President and his attorney to intimidate Mr. Cohen or others not to testify.”

Cohen postponed previously scheduled testimony on Capitol Hill, citing concern about threats by Trump and his lawyer against Cohen and his family.

 

While Congressional Democrats are eager to elicit damaging information about Trump’s business practices and involvement in authorizing the hush money payments, Republicans and Trump allies are certain to denounce him as an admitted liar whose testimony cannot be trusted.  And with many of the issues on Cummings’s list under active investigation by prosecutors, Cohen may not be able to respond to some questions in public.

 

Republican Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and a staunch Trump ally, said he was disappointed that the committee chairman’s first major hearing will feature Cohen as “phase one of the Democrats’ coordinated campaign to remove the president from office.”

Republicans ready to blast Cohen for lying

 

“Mr. Cohen cannot be trusted to partake in honest fact-finding before our body,” Jordan said in a statement last week.  “He’s said so himself – to a federal judge – when he [pleaded] guilty to lying to Congress.”

 

But Democrats say the prison-bound Cohen has little incentive to lie.  Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he wants to know why Cohen lied when he first appeared before the committee a year ago and who was aware that he was going to deliver a false testimony.

 

“We think he has a lot to offer,” Schiff said on ABC’s “This Week” program on Sunday.

 

As for Cummings, the House oversight committee chairman, he says he plans to run “a fair hearing “like a judge.”

 

“I know the Democrats are going to be lashing at him, I know the Republicans are going to say, why should we believe you today?” Cummings told a local television station in Baltimore.  But I think, me being in the middle, trying to keep them on a higher realm, we’ll get there.”

 

 

your ad here

Ukrainian President Visits US Destroyer on Port Call

Ukraine’s president has gone aboard a U.S. warship making a call at a Ukrainian port, hailing its visit as a warning to Russia.

President Petro Poroshenko visited the destroyer USS Donald Cook in the port of Odessa on Tuesday. He said in a statement that the ship’s visit was “an important signal to the Kremlin,” underlining close U.S.-Ukrainian military cooperation.

Poroshenko also met with Kurt Volker, the U.S. special envoy on Ukraine, thanking the U.S. for expanding its presence in the Black Sea after the Russian seizure of three Ukrainian vessels and their crews in November. The incident further escalated the tug-of-war that followed Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.

 

Volker described the destroyer’s visit as “a strong symbol of the United States’ commitment to the people of Ukraine.”

 

your ad here

Task Force: US Efforts to Battle Extremism ‘Unsustainable’

A new report is calling on the United States to significantly change its approach to fighting terrorists and extremist groups, warning success on the battlefield will never be enough to stop the spread of extremist ideology.

The report, released Wednesday by the bipartisan Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States, says that after nearly two decades and an estimated $5.9 trillion spent fighting terror groups in the Middle East and North Africa, the U.S. and its partners must prioritize prevention over military solutions.

“Terrorism is a symptom, but extremism — an ideology calling for the imposition of a totalitarian order intent on destroying free societies like ours — is the disease,” the report warns. “The United States thus finds itself trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of crisis response.”

“Even modest preventive investments — if they are strategic, coordinated, and well-timed — can reduce the risk that extremists will exploit fragile states,” it adds.

The task force’s findings come as the Islamic State terror group, whose ideology attracted tens of thousands of fighters to flock to Syria and Iraq, appears to be in decline.

Its self-declared caliphate, which once spread over large swaths of Syria and Iraq, has been reduced to a small collection of tents and damaged buildings on a patch of land in the northeastern Syrian village of Baghuz.

Officials with the international coalition fighting IS estimate several hundred of the terror group’s “most hardened” fighters remain inside. But commanders with the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces say the terrorists are surrounded, and that while it may take several more days, their defeat is inevitable.

Rather than see the collapse of the IS caliphate as an end, though, the task force says the liberation of the final stretch of territory should be seen as an opening to refocus U.S. priorities in the fight against terror.

“What we need is a sense of urgency,” the task force’s co-chairs — former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean and former Indiana Congressman Lee Hamilton — said in the report.

“The threat that it (IS) could reestablish itself in another fragile state underscores prevention’s importance,” they wrote, adding other countries increasingly share the same view. “We should harness this emerging consensus.”

The task force argues that a large part of the U.S. focus must shift to failed or failing states where the government services and institutions are no longer able to provide for its citizens.

Extremist attempts to establish control “resonate only in societies where the existing state has failed its people,” the report warns.

But rather than try to impose solutions, the report recommends the U.S. work to find partners on the ground who are, at the least, committed to governing responsibly.

The report also calls on the U.S. to streamline its approach, noting that while numerous agencies already are funding prevention-based initiatives, such efforts have been “disjointed, piecemeal, and intermittent.”

And it calls for the creation of a so-called Partnership Development Fund, a “new international platform for donors and the private sector to pool their resources and coordinate their activities.”

Task force members admit progress in the fight against terrorism and extremism will not come overnight, but they warn the failure to adopt a prevention-driven approach could have devastating consequences.

Already, they say, the number of annual terror attacks have increased fivefold since 2001, while the number of Salafi-jihadist fighters has more than tripled over the same period, operating out of 19 countries across the Middle East and Africa.

U.S. military and intelligence officials have likewise warned that Islamic State, while losing control of almost all the territory it once ruled, still has up to 30,000 fighters and followers across Syria and Iraq, while al-Qaida also has managed to strengthen its position in Syria, while maintaining close ties to affiliates in Yemen and elsewhere.

So, too, there are concerns that U.S. intervention has either backfired, or at the most, produced only short-term gains against terrorist and extremist groups, citing examples in Iraq, Libya, Mali and Yemen.

“”The United States thus finds itself trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of crisis response,” the report states, adding however, that a commitment to a prevention-based approach will pay off.

“Every dollar invested in efforts to prevent conflict saves $16 in spending on reconstruction, crisis management and the military,” the report says, pointing to recent analysis by the World Bank and the United Nations.

 

 

your ad here

Task Force: US Efforts to Battle Extremism ‘Unsustainable’

A new report is calling on the United States to significantly change its approach to fighting terrorists and extremist groups, warning success on the battlefield will never be enough to stop the spread of extremist ideology.

The report, released Wednesday by the bipartisan Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States, says that after nearly two decades and an estimated $5.9 trillion spent fighting terror groups in the Middle East and North Africa, the U.S. and its partners must prioritize prevention over military solutions.

“Terrorism is a symptom, but extremism — an ideology calling for the imposition of a totalitarian order intent on destroying free societies like ours — is the disease,” the report warns. “The United States thus finds itself trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of crisis response.”

“Even modest preventive investments — if they are strategic, coordinated, and well-timed — can reduce the risk that extremists will exploit fragile states,” it adds.

The task force’s findings come as the Islamic State terror group, whose ideology attracted tens of thousands of fighters to flock to Syria and Iraq, appears to be in decline.

Its self-declared caliphate, which once spread over large swaths of Syria and Iraq, has been reduced to a small collection of tents and damaged buildings on a patch of land in the northeastern Syrian village of Baghuz.

Officials with the international coalition fighting IS estimate several hundred of the terror group’s “most hardened” fighters remain inside. But commanders with the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces say the terrorists are surrounded, and that while it may take several more days, their defeat is inevitable.

Rather than see the collapse of the IS caliphate as an end, though, the task force says the liberation of the final stretch of territory should be seen as an opening to refocus U.S. priorities in the fight against terror.

“What we need is a sense of urgency,” the task force’s co-chairs — former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean and former Indiana Congressman Lee Hamilton — said in the report.

“The threat that it (IS) could reestablish itself in another fragile state underscores prevention’s importance,” they wrote, adding other countries increasingly share the same view. “We should harness this emerging consensus.”

The task force argues that a large part of the U.S. focus must shift to failed or failing states where the government services and institutions are no longer able to provide for its citizens.

Extremist attempts to establish control “resonate only in societies where the existing state has failed its people,” the report warns.

But rather than try to impose solutions, the report recommends the U.S. work to find partners on the ground who are, at the least, committed to governing responsibly.

The report also calls on the U.S. to streamline its approach, noting that while numerous agencies already are funding prevention-based initiatives, such efforts have been “disjointed, piecemeal, and intermittent.”

And it calls for the creation of a so-called Partnership Development Fund, a “new international platform for donors and the private sector to pool their resources and coordinate their activities.”

Task force members admit progress in the fight against terrorism and extremism will not come overnight, but they warn the failure to adopt a prevention-driven approach could have devastating consequences.

Already, they say, the number of annual terror attacks have increased fivefold since 2001, while the number of Salafi-jihadist fighters has more than tripled over the same period, operating out of 19 countries across the Middle East and Africa.

U.S. military and intelligence officials have likewise warned that Islamic State, while losing control of almost all the territory it once ruled, still has up to 30,000 fighters and followers across Syria and Iraq, while al-Qaida also has managed to strengthen its position in Syria, while maintaining close ties to affiliates in Yemen and elsewhere.

So, too, there are concerns that U.S. intervention has either backfired, or at the most, produced only short-term gains against terrorist and extremist groups, citing examples in Iraq, Libya, Mali and Yemen.

“”The United States thus finds itself trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of crisis response,” the report states, adding however, that a commitment to a prevention-based approach will pay off.

“Every dollar invested in efforts to prevent conflict saves $16 in spending on reconstruction, crisis management and the military,” the report says, pointing to recent analysis by the World Bank and the United Nations.

 

 

your ad here

China-US Huawei 5G Standoff Overshadows Mobile Tech Summit in Spain

5G-connected robots, cars, drones and virtual-reality gaming sets are among the thousands of futuristic gadgets on display at this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain. While there is much excitement over how 5G networks will transform our everyday lives, the conference is overshadowed by the standoff between the United States and Beijing over the Chinese telecoms giant Huawei – which the U.S. says could be used by the Chinese government for espionage. Henry Ridgwell has more.

your ad here

Shaka: Extra Time

We are live. In Extra Time Shaka answers your questions about politics in Africa.

your ad here

Shaka: Extra Time

We are live. In Extra Time Shaka answers your questions about politics in Africa.

your ad here

Nigeria’s Buhari Leading in Partial Election Results

Vote counting continues in Nigeria after last Saturday’s presidential election. Initial results indicate incumbent President Muhammadu Buhari is in the lead.

The official announcement of partial results started Monday and the process is moving slowly. Early results show Buhari by 1.5 million votes ahead of his closest challenger at the halfway point of state-by-state announcements of the results of Saturday’s election.

For supporters like Nasir Usman it’s a result he was hoping to see.

 

“We will be happy if Buhari wins this election. There is no problem in this country and Buhari has brought peace. Everything is working in this country,” Usman said.

For Nigerians like Taiwo Ogunkuade, who supports the main opposition candidate, Atiku Abubakar, conceding defeat will not be easy.

“If Atiku loses in this election, I’ll feel so bad and I don’t think the majority of people fighting for him to become the president will feel so good about this. It’s really not going to be a good news for most of the people,” Ogunkuade said.

Jaiye Gaskia, a political analyst, says Buhari’s All Progressives Congress (APC) could win but that the margin of victory might be slim.

“It seems from what is emerging that the APC has a slight edge over the PDP (opposition People Democratic Party) but the results are not showing any dramatic differences in terms of differences in the number of votes between the two parties. I think it’s going to be a close election,” she said.

Gaskia said he worries that neither of the top candidates is fit for the job.

“I’m worried because it does seem that one of these two is going to be president and very likely the incumbent but I don’t see it transforming into a better life for the common and average Nigerian because the growth model that both candidates have favored are models that are not inclusive,” Gaskia said.

But as more results emerge, Nigerians are watching and wondering.  Will the trends continue to favor the incumbent leader or is there still a glimmer of hope for his main challenger?

 

 

your ad here